From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Smith Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] c/r: Add AF_UNIX support (v6) Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 10:13:09 -0700 Message-ID: <87ocqvlcyi.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com> References: <1248295301-30930-1-git-send-email-danms@us.ibm.com> <1248295301-30930-6-git-send-email-danms@us.ibm.com> <4A6F2D62.9040005@librato.com> <87ljm8czsf.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com> <4A6F6B19.9010508@librato.com> <878wi6yxui.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com> <4A77F0EF.9090602@librato.com> <87ws5jlidl.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com> <4A786A6F.10902@librato.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: containers@lists.osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan To: Oren Laadan Return-path: Received: from gw0.danplanet.com ([71.245.107.82]:39279 "EHLO mail.danplanet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932953AbZHDRNX (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:13:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A786A6F.10902@librato.com> (Oren Laadan's message of "Tue\, 04 Aug 2009 13\:05\:51 -0400") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: OL> What I meant is that restore (and therefore checkpoint) need to OL> know how to handle skb's sent with sendto() but without proper OL> connection, where the target socket is still unconnected. I see. I'll have to think on that a bit. OL> I'm ok with declaring this case unsupported for now and put it in OL> the 'todo' list, and meanwhile work towards getting the current OL> afunix patches into the cr-dev tree. (As long as it doesn't it OL> will be buried there forever...) Okay, I think that would be most productive :) -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center email: danms@us.ibm.com