From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 325223D6477; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:10:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768903849; cv=none; b=kd1gWERuUiSNTFyvJpc7XmCO6087d2c9tziLX4LmK8kB1DgS2lfUEvSNEec+vaozvACSMv1unscGvx+4gRJzxK5WYllFOyizi9tjugE11KYMKULMV8utaMkFPDabWu6bRRoSLIyvcR1wXrtAS6TAI366SifhTTuVRvzHXsTc40E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768903849; c=relaxed/simple; bh=F1Zw6TCGLNqf3t6hP+FCcbTvxMoD0YoiJHXLgtM7PPI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gVbsfLze+EQ7CCHBX8KjowNKyXabsjEshB70em4nkiT7laG9AL669w3SFiYjmhQcCWuUDoglo5I9k9pMhWHGkocc+SOwNjFQGoJU2vbUrtHpp8jiHsG0lIonEKaAJJ7ieZiCSag85nKgup8JF0ZDSXIocvJtduPZZEN3gwkGKI0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=ev756wyh; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=tzJGH8MJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="ev756wyh"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="tzJGH8MJ" From: John Ogness DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1768903845; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=F1Zw6TCGLNqf3t6hP+FCcbTvxMoD0YoiJHXLgtM7PPI=; b=ev756wyhL5oQnxjyE0+KoLudN4honMIfLcxvyPGFhr1d/VzdxpgQ2ZHOe1V52q9vINy3Bt J8F7TQPucHTeZxLz6wtzTCwjGJcc7hFB9aXDegnCOt3UhciYgacTLo3BmXHIvxlXFh6bGi d7efX8U+VBoKoqNtXL9VnI2DvPpCu18UMnRCI+7+nN5/Nks6FB/+VRlf5XKozAYNdoQun1 auoFUvHszT8nsMVUhJYuTOBYuhQ0/iyKnA6822yyPxPjQj3V3i7p52tr3DiiYCplcavqPi MnXpZo5kmPXtbk2l7cYFmgi3rPWpt/us36pQSEGF9CRuKRY/G8OaFlQ2ETxAIA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1768903845; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=F1Zw6TCGLNqf3t6hP+FCcbTvxMoD0YoiJHXLgtM7PPI=; b=tzJGH8MJuM4p47lqYxbDcT2lBgFfaT9tUAk6oOgV/TfsHRllTtyrYiZolP181FU4Dxl7Mb 1ngVRy/OAZnC77BA== To: Petr Mladek , Breno Leitao Cc: osandov@osandov.com, mpdesouza@suse.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, asantostc@gmail.com, efault@gmx.de, gustavold@gmail.com, calvin@wbinvd.org, jv@jvosburgh.net, kernel-team@meta.com, Simon Horman , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , rostedt@goodmis.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: netconsole: convert to NBCON console infrastructure In-Reply-To: References: <87eco09hgb.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> <875x9a6cpw.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> <44upa7szd563kggh4xolznmfcwfnhrrh5guvecp6pzlvp5qvic@w7hxtzy7huzf> <6tryrckp7mah2qghxu5fktrwexoik6anplubfvybushtcgocq5@kg6ln44istyk> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 11:16:43 +0106 Message-ID: <87pl74tx0c.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On 2026-01-20, Petr Mladek wrote: > Is the netconsole part ready for mainline? > > If yes, I would suggest to send the full patchset for review and it > might go in via the networking tree. > > If no, then we could try to get in at least the printk part for > 6.20. I would personally use the variant with caller_id2 just to be on > the safe side. I am also fine with these changes (and caller_id2). Please add me CC when submitting the official patches. John