From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: Qingfang Deng <dqfext@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] net: ppp: convert to IFF_NO_QUEUE
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 12:47:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pln99a28.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241104115004.GC2118587@kernel.org>
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> writes:
> + Toke
>
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 06:36:56PM +0800, Qingfang Deng wrote:
>> When testing the parallel TX performance of a single PPPoE interface
>> over a 2.5GbE link with multiple hardware queues, the throughput could
>> not exceed 1.9Gbps, even with low CPU usage.
>>
>> This issue arises because the PPP interface is registered with a single
>> queue and a tx_queue_len of 3. This default behavior dates back to Linux
>> 2.3.13, which was suitable for slower serial ports. However, in modern
>> devices with multiple processors and hardware queues, this configuration
>> can lead to congestion.
>>
>> For PPPoE/PPTP, the lower interface should handle qdisc, so we need to
>> set IFF_NO_QUEUE. For PPP over a serial port, we don't benefit from a
>> qdisc with such a short TX queue, so handling TX queueing in the driver
>> and setting IFF_NO_QUEUE is more effective.
>>
>> With this change, PPPoE interfaces can now fully saturate a 2.5GbE link.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qingfang Deng <dqfext@gmail.com>
>
> Hi Toke,
>
> I'm wondering if you could offer an opinion on this.
Hi Simon
Thanks for bringing this to my attention; I'll reply to the parent
directly :)
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-05 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-29 10:36 [RFC PATCH net-next] net: ppp: convert to IFF_NO_QUEUE Qingfang Deng
2024-11-04 11:50 ` Simon Horman
2024-11-05 11:47 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2024-11-07 14:51 ` Simon Horman
2024-11-05 12:23 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-11-05 14:25 ` Qingfang Deng
2024-11-05 14:35 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2024-11-05 15:04 ` Qingfang Deng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pln99a28.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dqfext@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).