From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinicius Costa Gomes Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/4] etf: Cancel timer if there are no pending skbs Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 11:19:45 -0800 Message-ID: <87pnuia04u.fsf@intel.com> References: <20181115012635.7272-1-vinicius.gomes@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Jesus Sanchez-Palencia , jhs@mojatatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us, jesus.s.palencia@gmail.com, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:52913 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725987AbeLCTTs (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2018 14:19:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20181115012635.7272-1-vinicius.gomes@intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, Vinicius Costa Gomes writes: > From: Jesus Sanchez-Palencia > > There is no point in firing the qdisc watchdog if there are no future > skbs pending in the queue and the watchdog had been set previously. > > Signed-off-by: Jesus Sanchez-Palencia It seems that I made a mistake when submitting this series. It should have been proposed to the net tree (instead of net-next) and should have included a "Fixes" tag. Is there a way to have this series considered for the net tree at this point (given that it already landed on net-next)? Cheers,