From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nix Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT net-next #2 0/6] via-rhine receive buffers rework Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:16:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87pp78dv8k.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> References: <87vbh6364u.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <20150408215051.GA25326@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <87r3rtjhtn.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <20150409224141.GA17832@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , rl@hellgate.ch, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen To: Francois Romieu Return-path: Received: from icebox.esperi.org.uk ([81.187.191.129]:42194 "EHLO mail.esperi.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754192AbbDMNQV (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:16:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150409224141.GA17832@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> (Francois Romieu's message of "Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:41:41 +0200") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 9 Apr 2015, Francois Romieu told this: > Nix : > [...] >> Of course now I've done this it's not crashing! Maybe it's netconsole- >> related on top of everything else, or I'm just being unlucky... I'll >> keep trying. > > Please no netconsole yet. Still trying. It hasn't crashed since I turned netconsole off despite a couple of days of loading, so it's quite possible that this crash is netconsole-related. (Without the receive buffers rework, the crash is much faster and happens even without netconsole, so the rework is clearly necessary and definitely improves things dramatically.) -- NULL && (void)