From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>,
Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com>
Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: openvswitch: Avoid needlessly taking the RTNL on vport destroy
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 12:58:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87qzswklc7.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <198C2570-F384-4385-8A6B-84DCC38BB5F5@redhat.com>
Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com> writes:
> On 11 Dec 2025, at 12:50, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
>> The openvswitch teardown code will immediately call
>> ovs_netdev_detach_dev() in response to a NETDEV_UNREGISTER notification.
>> It will then start the dp_notify_work workqueue, which will later end up
>> calling the vport destroy() callback. This callback takes the RTNL to do
>> another ovs_netdev_detach_port(), which in this case is unnecessary.
>> This causes extra pressure on the RTNL, in some cases leading to
>> "unregister_netdevice: waiting for XX to become free" warnings on
>> teardown.
>>
>> We can straight-forwardly avoid the extra RTNL lock acquisition by
>> checking the device flags before taking the lock, and skip the locking
>> altogether if the IFF_OVS_DATAPATH flag has already been unset.
>>
>> Fixes: b07c26511e94 ("openvswitch: fix vport-netdev unregister")
>> Tested-by: Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
>
> Guess the change looks good, but I’m waiting for some feedback from
> Adrian to see if this change makes sense.
OK.
> Any luck reproducing the issue it’s supposed to fix?
We got a report from the customer that originally reported it (who had
their own reproducer) that this patch fixes their issue to the point
where they can now delete ~2000 pods/node without triggering the
unregister_netdevice warning at all (where before it triggered at around
~500 pod deletions). So that's encouraging :)
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-15 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-11 11:50 [PATCH v2] net: openvswitch: Avoid needlessly taking the RTNL on vport destroy Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-12-15 8:41 ` Eelco Chaudron
2025-12-15 11:58 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2025-12-15 12:31 ` Eelco Chaudron
2025-12-22 11:29 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-12-22 11:44 ` Eelco Chaudron
2025-12-15 13:14 ` Aaron Conole
[not found] ` <CAKDHXDHsdfRfaDyfzoTymsPkm=mPdFtJOA=GHb6HGx6TjvYA7w@mail.gmail.com>
2025-12-16 11:59 ` Adrián Moreno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87qzswklc7.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=amorenoz@redhat.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
--cc=jesse@nicira.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).