From: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] macsec: Abort MACSec Rx offload datapath when skb is not marked with MACSec metadata
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2023 14:15:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r0l25y1c.fsf@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZULRxX9eIbFiVi7v@hog> (Sabrina Dubroca's message of "Wed, 1 Nov 2023 23:31:33 +0100")
On Wed, 01 Nov, 2023 23:31:33 +0100 Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net> wrote:
> 2023-11-01, 13:02:17 -0700, Rahul Rameshbabu wrote:
>> When MACSec is configured on an outer netdev, traffic received directly
>> through the underlying netdev should not be processed by the MACSec Rx
>> datapath. When using MACSec offload on an outer netdev, traffic with no
>> metadata indicator in the skb is mistakenly considered as MACSec traffic
>> and incorrectly handled in the handle_not_macsec function. Treat skbs with
>> no metadata type as non-MACSec packets rather than assuming they are MACSec
>> packets.
>
> What about the other drivers? mlx5 is the only driver that sets md_dst
> on its macsec skbs, so their offloaded packets just get dropped now?
After taking a deeper look throughout the tree, I realize there are
macsec offloading drivers that do not set md_dst. In this event, we fail
to correctly handle the skb and deliver to the port as you mentioned
previously. Sorry about this miss on my end.
However, I believe that all macsec offload supporting devices run into
the following problem today (including mlx5 devices).
When I configure macsec offload on a device and then vlan on top of the
macsec interface, I become unable to send traffic through the underlying
device.
(can replace mlx5_1 with any ifname of a device that supports macsec offload)
Side 1
ip link del macsec0
ip address flush mlx5_1
ip address add 1.1.1.1/24 dev mlx5_1
ip link set dev mlx5_1 up
ip link add link mlx5_1 macsec0 type macsec sci 1 encrypt on
ip link set dev macsec0 address 00:11:22:33:44:66
ip macsec offload macsec0 mac
ip macsec add macsec0 tx sa 0 pn 1 on key 00 dffafc8d7b9a43d5b9a3dfbbf6a30c16
ip macsec add macsec0 rx sci 2 on
ip macsec add macsec0 rx sci 2 sa 0 pn 1 on key 00 ead3664f508eb06c40ac7104cdae4ce5
ip address flush macsec0
ip address add 2.2.2.1/24 dev macsec0
ip link set dev macsec0 up
ip link add link macsec0 name macsec_vlan type vlan id 1
ip link set dev macsec_vlan address 00:11:22:33:44:88
ip address flush macsec_vlan
ip address add 3.3.3.1/24 dev macsec_vlan
ip link set dev macsec_vlan up
Side 2
ip link del macsec0
ip address flush mlx5_1
ip address add 1.1.1.2/24 dev mlx5_1
ip link set dev mlx5_1 up
ip link add link mlx5_1 macsec0 type macsec sci 2 encrypt on
ip link set dev macsec0 address 00:11:22:33:44:77
ip macsec offload macsec0 mac
ip macsec add macsec0 tx sa 0 pn 1 on key 00 ead3664f508eb06c40ac7104cdae4ce5
ip macsec add macsec0 rx sci 1 on
ip macsec add macsec0 rx sci 1 sa 0 pn 1 on key 00 dffafc8d7b9a43d5b9a3dfbbf6a30c16
ip address flush macsec0
ip address add 2.2.2.2/24 dev macsec0
ip link set dev macsec0 up
ip link add link macsec0 name macsec_vlan type vlan id 1
ip link set dev macsec_vlan address 00:11:22:33:44:99
ip address flush macsec_vlan
ip address add 3.3.3.2/24 dev macsec_vlan
ip link set dev macsec_vlan up
Side 1
ping -I mlx5_1 1.1.1.2
PING 1.1.1.2 (1.1.1.2) from 1.1.1.1 mlx5_1: 56(84) bytes of data.
From 1.1.1.1 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable
ping: sendmsg: No route to host
From 1.1.1.1 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
From 1.1.1.1 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable
I am thinking the solution is a combination of annotating which macsec
devices support md_dst and this patch. However, I am not sure this fix
would be helpful for devices that support macsec offload without
utilizing md_dst information (would still be problematic).
Would be glad to hear any suggestions you may have before sending out a
v2.
Sorry for the late reply. Was away from a trip and wanted to validate
some things before posting back.
--
Thanks,
Rahul Rameshbabu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-06 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-01 20:02 [PATCH net] macsec: Abort MACSec Rx offload datapath when skb is not marked with MACSec metadata Rahul Rameshbabu
2023-11-01 22:31 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2023-11-06 22:15 ` Rahul Rameshbabu [this message]
2023-11-15 15:19 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2023-11-15 16:21 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r0l25y1c.fsf@nvidia.com \
--to=rrameshbabu@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeed@kernel.org \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).