From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A670C43460 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2785361220 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237129AbhDLIFp (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 04:05:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54698 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237075AbhDLIFo (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 04:05:44 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C3E5C061574 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 01:05:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id a25so977152ljm.11 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 01:05:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudflare.com; s=google; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=UJUZ5l+pwb94CXGmjUo0/e251C6xLvaEkwpXTFxqWxA=; b=iVAb7vJAZL3xNbiRZqDlWuRDPrbzftnEC07YIJlZos4pNad3eScwPFC3jTXMufI8LX 8KQbvRT+N9A1drMSvHycGWVjBIN74tTOFqdvBiuSQAE4EqHyUGNckgzikDEEFjVoH6fD jMKe6RRjaVS+3u4DBiAfkA8bn09AdzvDwJMn8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=UJUZ5l+pwb94CXGmjUo0/e251C6xLvaEkwpXTFxqWxA=; b=lfBuRmcUqPaznF9hVmR/DU9lCNIEBtIyIxKHn9AxTN9zUgNF1486tys8EkDQc+xnnc 9sCVVxd956Y72iu1OVH4GaQjz79UJDqDwcjwit94PJuULQiALEGJvt5wZkutJaG12vok C3xBbEZ57SlxfdEQM7Ln7ru4mz8ldAgUYky2r3w1vWFMVB982OTGbfo4lZJCgIFGnX6d C3nlnx+etsdHidcy/vvu9MBrvp2J4R6uBnSo3KcQOaX2OlIumApij80lrKW2d2J+DHQj mHv41V4eXGL4Is2PIU3nhaSS5qIgpFA+S5luUZAc2AA9Tk7tNEqkFnz0WGnTYNt0aL/q CwWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5320ovFN3EAsbMD8+cZe1xs8VmxMbAZneIISo+R6uPt0R1jZMSul bhppJT4ICKzpAWfubBOmltcLDQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzzvWmMcZuSAAXGirY2acPsow1EdDKCC5gv1xy4oJ1TSAImzbsK5/th4asQ6X9yL7Gq+mImMA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1243:: with SMTP id h3mr17555000ljh.128.1618214724994; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 01:05:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cloudflare.com (79.184.75.85.ipv4.supernova.orange.pl. [79.184.75.85]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d7sm2131512lfv.268.2021.04.12.01.05.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 01:05:24 -0700 (PDT) References: <20210407032111.33398-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 27.1 From: Jakub Sitnicki To: Cong Wang Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Cong Wang , syzbot+320a3bc8d80f478c37e4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, John Fastabend , Eric Dumazet , Daniel Borkmann , Lorenz Bauer Subject: Re: [Patch bpf-next] skmsg: pass psock pointer to ->psock_update_sk_prot() In-reply-to: <20210407032111.33398-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:05:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87r1jg2aik.fsf@cloudflare.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 05:21 AM CEST, Cong Wang wrote: > From: Cong Wang > > Using sk_psock() to retrieve psock pointer from sock requires > RCU read lock, but we already get psock pointer before calling > ->psock_update_sk_prot() in both cases, so we can just pass it > without bothering sk_psock(). > > Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+320a3bc8d80f478c37e4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Fixes: 8a59f9d1e3d4 ("sock: Introduce sk->sk_prot->psock_update_sk_prot()") > Cc: John Fastabend > Cc: Eric Dumazet > Cc: Daniel Borkmann > Cc: Jakub Sitnicki > Cc: Lorenz Bauer > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang > --- We don't necessarily need to pass both sk and psock. psock has a backpointer to sk that owns it. Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki