From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] mpls: Move reserved label definitions
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 16:07:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sib9fm9u.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430841990-2828702-1-git-send-email-tom@herbertland.com> (Tom Herbert's message of "Tue, 5 May 2015 09:06:30 -0700")
Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> writes:
> Move to include/uapi/linux/mpls.h to be externally visibile.
Quick question.
Have you looked to see if any of the BSD's provide any of these
definitions? I believe the existing macros in this header are
used by tcpdump and are used by the bsds.
I am just thinking if there was already similar definitions in different
unices it would be polite to ensure we have the names in sync.
Eric
> Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/mpls.h | 10 ++++++++++
> net/mpls/af_mpls.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> net/mpls/internal.h | 10 ----------
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/mpls.h b/include/uapi/linux/mpls.h
> index bc9abfe..0fe6ea5 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/mpls.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/mpls.h
> @@ -31,4 +31,14 @@ struct mpls_label {
> #define MPLS_LS_TTL_MASK 0x000000FF
> #define MPLS_LS_TTL_SHIFT 0
>
> +/* Reserved labels */
> +#define MPLS_LABEL_IPV4_EXPLICIT_NULL 0 /* RFC3032 */
> +#define MPLS_LABEL_ROUTER_ALERT 1 /* RFC3032 */
> +#define MPLS_LABEL_IPV6_EXPLICIT_NULL 2 /* RFC3032 */
> +#define MPLS_LABEL_IMPLICIT_NULL 3 /* RFC3032 */
> +#define MPLS_LABEL_ENTROPY_INDICATOR 7 /* RFC6790 */
> +#define MPLS_LABEL_GAL 13 /* RFC5586 */
> +#define MPLS_LABEL_OAM_ALERT 14 /* RFC3429 */
> +#define MPLS_LABEL_EXTENSION 15 /* RFC7274 */
> +
> #endif /* _UAPI_MPLS_H */
> diff --git a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
> index 954810c..b6eb761 100644
> --- a/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
> +++ b/net/mpls/af_mpls.c
> @@ -647,7 +647,7 @@ int nla_get_labels(const struct nlattr *nla,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> switch (dec.label) {
> - case LABEL_IMPLICIT_NULL:
> + case MPLS_LABEL_IMPLICIT_NULL:
> /* RFC3032: This is a label that an LSR may
> * assign and distribute, but which never
> * actually appears in the encapsulation.
> @@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ static int resize_platform_label_table(struct net *net, size_t limit)
> }
>
> /* In case the predefined labels need to be populated */
> - if (limit > LABEL_IPV4_EXPLICIT_NULL) {
> + if (limit > MPLS_LABEL_IPV4_EXPLICIT_NULL) {
> struct net_device *lo = net->loopback_dev;
> rt0 = mpls_rt_alloc(lo->addr_len);
> if (!rt0)
> @@ -945,7 +945,7 @@ static int resize_platform_label_table(struct net *net, size_t limit)
> rt0->rt_via_table = NEIGH_LINK_TABLE;
> memcpy(rt0->rt_via, lo->dev_addr, lo->addr_len);
> }
> - if (limit > LABEL_IPV6_EXPLICIT_NULL) {
> + if (limit > MPLS_LABEL_IPV6_EXPLICIT_NULL) {
> struct net_device *lo = net->loopback_dev;
> rt2 = mpls_rt_alloc(lo->addr_len);
> if (!rt2)
> @@ -973,15 +973,15 @@ static int resize_platform_label_table(struct net *net, size_t limit)
> memcpy(labels, old, cp_size);
>
> /* If needed set the predefined labels */
> - if ((old_limit <= LABEL_IPV6_EXPLICIT_NULL) &&
> - (limit > LABEL_IPV6_EXPLICIT_NULL)) {
> - RCU_INIT_POINTER(labels[LABEL_IPV6_EXPLICIT_NULL], rt2);
> + if ((old_limit <= MPLS_LABEL_IPV6_EXPLICIT_NULL) &&
> + (limit > MPLS_LABEL_IPV6_EXPLICIT_NULL)) {
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(labels[MPLS_LABEL_IPV6_EXPLICIT_NULL], rt2);
> rt2 = NULL;
> }
>
> - if ((old_limit <= LABEL_IPV4_EXPLICIT_NULL) &&
> - (limit > LABEL_IPV4_EXPLICIT_NULL)) {
> - RCU_INIT_POINTER(labels[LABEL_IPV4_EXPLICIT_NULL], rt0);
> + if ((old_limit <= MPLS_LABEL_IPV4_EXPLICIT_NULL) &&
> + (limit > MPLS_LABEL_IPV4_EXPLICIT_NULL)) {
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(labels[MPLS_LABEL_IPV4_EXPLICIT_NULL], rt0);
> rt0 = NULL;
> }
>
> diff --git a/net/mpls/internal.h b/net/mpls/internal.h
> index 693877d..b064c34 100644
> --- a/net/mpls/internal.h
> +++ b/net/mpls/internal.h
> @@ -1,16 +1,6 @@
> #ifndef MPLS_INTERNAL_H
> #define MPLS_INTERNAL_H
>
> -#define LABEL_IPV4_EXPLICIT_NULL 0 /* RFC3032 */
> -#define LABEL_ROUTER_ALERT_LABEL 1 /* RFC3032 */
> -#define LABEL_IPV6_EXPLICIT_NULL 2 /* RFC3032 */
> -#define LABEL_IMPLICIT_NULL 3 /* RFC3032 */
> -#define LABEL_ENTROPY_INDICATOR 7 /* RFC6790 */
> -#define LABEL_GAL 13 /* RFC5586 */
> -#define LABEL_OAM_ALERT 14 /* RFC3429 */
> -#define LABEL_EXTENSION 15 /* RFC7274 */
> -
> -
> struct mpls_shim_hdr {
> __be32 label_stack_entry;
> };
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-06 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-05 16:06 [PATCH net-next] mpls: Move reserved label definitions Tom Herbert
2015-05-05 23:41 ` David Miller
2015-05-06 21:07 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2015-05-06 22:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-05-06 22:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sib9fm9u.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox