Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/3] bpf, sockmap: Fix incorrect copied_seq calculation

[Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>]

On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 02:49 AM GMT, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> November 20, 2025 at 03:53, "Jakub Sitnicki" <jakub@cloudflare.com mailto:jakub@cloudflare.com?to=%22Jakub%20Sitnicki%22%20%3Cjakub%40cloudflare.com%3E > wrote:
>
> [...]
>> >  +/* The BPF program sets BPF_F_INGRESS on sk_msg to indicate data needs to be
>> >  + * redirected to the ingress queue of a specified socket. Since BPF_F_INGRESS is
>> >  + * defined in UAPI so that we can't extend this enum for our internal flags. We
>> >  + * define some internal flags here while inheriting BPF_F_INGRESS.
>> >  + */
>> >  +enum {
>> >  + SK_MSG_F_INGRESS = BPF_F_INGRESS, /* (1ULL << 0) */
>> >  + /* internal flag */
>> >  + SK_MSG_F_INGRESS_SELF = (1ULL << 1)
>> >  +};
>> >  +
>> > 
>> I'm wondering if we need additional state to track this.
>> Can we track sk_msg's construted from skb's that were not redirected by
>> setting `sk_msg.sk = sk` to indicate that the source socket is us in
>> sk_psock_skb_ingress_self()?
>
> Functionally, that would work. However, in that case, we would have to hold
> a reference to sk until the sk_msg is read, which would delay the release of
> sk. One concern is that if there is a bug in the read-side application, sk
> might never be released.

We don't need to grab a reference to sk if we're talking about setting
it only in sk_psock_skb_ingress_self(). psock already holds a ref for
psock->sk, and we purge psock->ingress_msg queue when destroying the
psock before releasing the sock ref in sk_psock_destroy().

While there's nothing wrong with an internal flaag, I'm trying to see if
we make things somewhat consistent so as a result sk_msg state is easier
to reason about.

My thinking here is that we already set sk_msg.sk to source socket in
sk_psock_msg_verdict() on sendmsg() path, so we know that this is the
purpose of that field. We could mimic this on recvmsg() path.