From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: Regression: Bug 196547 - Since 4.12 - bonding module not working with wireless drivers Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 16:14:48 +0300 Message-ID: <87tw1edz5j.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <87shh0gewn.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <8845e49b-3165-e6df-5935-c86278d220d9@broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Arend van Spriel , Mahesh Bandewar , Andy Gospodarek , David Miller , netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, James Feeney To: Andreas Born Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Andreas Born's message of "Thu, 10 Aug 2017 19:52:03 +0200") Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Andreas Born writes: > Earlier today I submitted the patch (bonding: require speed/duplex > only for 802.3ad, alb and tlb) [2] that only partially reverts what is > a regression following my aforementioned logic. This seems to me like > the best solution in the short term since it should satisfy both > usergroups represented by Mahesh and James and restores consistence > with the bonding documentation. James already commented approvingly on > that patch in the bug report. [3] > > Regards > Andreas > > [1] > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt Great, thanks. I'll take it the patch is meant for net tree (and not net-next) so that it will be fixed for v4.13? Also it should backported to v4.12 stable tree. I don't see any mention of that in the patch submission and that's why I'm asking. -- Kalle Valo