From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Antoine Tenart <atenart@redhat.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, jiri@resnulli.us,
edumazet@google.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, jhs@mojatatu.com,
carges@cloudflare.com, kernel-team@cloudflare.com,
Antoine Tenart <atenart@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v1 0/3] net: sched: refactor qdisc drop reasons into dedicated tracepoint
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2026 15:46:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v7gbz1ru.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADCXZ1yMkZbRd7ioGw5QQ61OdmYp6misUDoj-s-g7wuoiCHKbg@mail.gmail.com>
Antoine Tenart <atenart@redhat.com> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 12:34:18PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org> writes:
>> > On 05/02/2026 04.04, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> >
>> >> It will presumably require existing users to migrate over
>> >> but sooner we do it the fewer users that have to move?
>> >
>> > I agree. Existing users will loose some details, but the patchset
>> > results in fallback to SKB_DROP_REASON_QDISC_DROP as a drop reason,
>> > which existing tools/users will still handle.
>> > (The more specific drop reason is now avail via trace_qdisc_drop).
>> >
>> > Eric and Toke is this acceptable for your users?
>>
>> I like it! My only concern is that drop monitor tools will see two
>> events for each qdisc drop. I guess that could be relatively
>> straight-forwardly deduplicated in the tool, though? +Antoine who works
>> on Retis to give him a chance to complain if not :)
>
> Thanks for the heads up. We'll have to add support for the new enum
> (pretty straightforward), other than that things should just work.
>
> I'm wondering why not using the drop reason subsys logic to combine the
> qdisc specific enum while not conflicting with drop reasons and allowing
> to inject the qdisc reasons into drop reason enabled helpers as well?
See this prior discussion for how the proposal came to be:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/6be17a08-f8aa-4f91-9bd0-d9e1f0a92d90@kernel.org/
Basically, figuring out which qdisc a drop came from is not possible
with the current drop_reason code.
So it's not just new drop reasons, it's a separate tracepoint with more
information available (qdisc handle, name, etc). So you'll get two
events for qdisc drops with this series (from patch 1):
+ trace_qdisc_drop(q, txq, dev, skb, reason);
+ kfree_skb_reason(skb, SKB_DROP_REASON_QDISC_DROP);
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-05 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-04 17:02 [PATCH net-next RFC v1 0/3] net: sched: refactor qdisc drop reasons into dedicated tracepoint Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2026-02-04 17:02 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v1 1/3] net: sched: introduce qdisc-specific drop reason tracing Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2026-02-04 17:03 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v1 2/3] net: sched: sfq: convert to qdisc drop reasons Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2026-02-04 17:03 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v1 3/3] net: sched: sch_cake: use enum qdisc_drop_reason for cobalt_should_drop Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2026-02-05 3:04 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v1 0/3] net: sched: refactor qdisc drop reasons into dedicated tracepoint Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-05 8:48 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2026-02-05 11:34 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2026-02-05 14:15 ` Antoine Tenart
2026-02-05 14:46 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2026-02-05 16:24 ` Antoine Tenart
2026-02-06 14:41 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2026-02-06 15:04 ` Antoine Tenart
2026-02-06 15:21 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v7gbz1ru.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=atenart@redhat.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=carges@cloudflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox