From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: bryan.whitehead@microchip.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
anna-maria@linutronix.de, frederic@kernel.org,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, mbenes@suse.cz, jstultz@google.com,
andrew@lunn.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v3 1/2] posix-timers: Check timespec64 before call clock_set()
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 12:46:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v7yz96gr.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46efd1be-688e-ecd0-a9e1-cf5f69d0110f@huawei.com>
On Thu, Sep 12 2024 at 20:24, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> On 2024/9/12 20:04, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> How does this code validate timespecs for clock_settime(clockid) where
>> clockid != CLOCK_REALTIME?
>
> According to the man manual of clock_settime(), the other clockids are
> not settable.
>
> And in Linux kernel code, except for CLOCK_REALTIME which is defined in
> posix_clocks array, the clock_set() hooks are not defined and will
> return -EINVAL in SYSCALL_DEFINE2(clock_settime), so the check is not
> necessary.
You clearly understand the code you are modifying:
const struct k_clock clock_posix_dynamic = {
.clock_getres = pc_clock_getres,
.clock_set = pc_clock_settime,
which is what PTP clocks use and that's what this is about, no?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-13 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-09 7:41 [PATCH -next v3 0/2] posix-timers: Check timespec64 before call clock_set() Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-09 7:41 ` [PATCH -next v3 1/2] " Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-09 15:19 ` Richard Cochran
2024-09-10 11:23 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-10 12:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-10 12:30 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-10 15:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-12 2:53 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-12 12:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-12 12:24 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-13 10:46 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-09-14 9:00 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-09 7:41 ` [PATCH -next v3 2/2] net: lan743x: Remove duplicate check Jinjie Ruan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v7yz96gr.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=bryan.whitehead@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).