From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vivien Didelot Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Introduce _mv88e6xxx_phy_page_{read,write} Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 14:32:51 -0400 Message-ID: <87vb49gkdo.fsf@ketchup.mtl.sfl> References: <1458951004-27424-1-git-send-email-patrick@puiterwijk.org> <56F5E9D1.9030909@roeck-us.net> <56F5F71B.3090703@roeck-us.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: davem@davemloft.net, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, andrew@lunn.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Dennis Gilmore , Peter Robinson To: Guenter Roeck , Patrick Uiterwijk Return-path: Received: from mail.savoirfairelinux.com ([208.88.110.44]:45433 "EHLO mail.savoirfairelinux.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751009AbcCZScz (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Mar 2016 14:32:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <56F5F71B.3090703@roeck-us.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Guenter, Guenter Roeck writes: >>> Is there some good reason for changing the name of those labels ? >> >> Vivien suggested to rename this since it makes more clear that this write is >> meant to return to page 0 to make sure that phylib doesn't get confused >> about the currently active page. >> > > And "clear:" accomplishes that ? I would not have guessed. > Wonder if anyone else does. I would have used a comment. > /* Try to return to page 0 even after an error */ > or something like that. "error" definitely doesn't make sense, especially in case of success. If one has a better suggestion that "clear" for the label, I don't really mind. Thanks, Vivien