From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nix Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT net-next 0/4] via-rhine receive buffers rework Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 20:41:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87vbh7enfn.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> References: <87wq1plyjz.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87sicci5c1.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <20150407193110.GB24631@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , rl@hellgate.ch, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen To: Francois Romieu Return-path: Received: from icebox.esperi.org.uk ([81.187.191.129]:50764 "EHLO mail.esperi.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752935AbbDGTl0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2015 15:41:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150407193110.GB24631@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> (Francois Romieu's message of "Tue, 7 Apr 2015 21:31:10 +0200") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 7 Apr 2015, Francois Romieu stated: > Nix : > [...] >> No crashes in several hours of running: looks good! > > Mildly. :o/ > > You may never notice if you don't resume and the reset work queue doesn't > run but patch #4 lacks the bits below. I don't suspend this box, no, it uses only 5W of power and it's my link to the internet so suspending it would be a bad move :) > (rx_head_desc should go away) I'll test this out on top of the other stuff tomorrow... -- NULL && (void)