From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Reporting bugs and bisection Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:29:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87ve2kviex.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> References: <47FEADCB.7070104@rtr.ca> <22880.1207943922@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <47FFE5DA.8000709@imap.cc> <200804132040.12138.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080413184730.GD8474@1wt.eu> <20080413121831.d89dd424.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080414101813.GB14549@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Morton , Willy Tarreau , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Tilman Schmidt , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Mark Lord , David Miller , jesper.juhl@gmail.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, jeff@garzik.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080414101813.GB14549@elte.hu> (Ingo Molnar's message of "Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:18:13 +0200") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar writes: > > doing _kernel_ bisection is totally hard at the moment - it disrupts the > user way too much and causes many hours of work for most users. It depends. Sometimes the bisection can be done in qemu/kvm/xen or similar tools. At least if the problem is not too hardware dependent. And more and more people actually run in such environments. I can also do it faster with autoboot or nfs root/powerswitch, but admittedly that's a very specialized setup most people don't have. Still I agree with your basic point that it should be only last resort. -Andi