From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [45.145.95.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B1483B7770 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2026 10:07:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.145.95.4 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776074858; cv=none; b=oEpeG57yPJTjrCr+TzcTlK+dnGFpb4Vr3StH/+pMjymIzffOAhhIv4nPdPCVzLmgfQqPgRSRxbKkD2oy65rPXCzQBRiuRYoEvqDNH5LiWWwv1kMfQuAjWW9uqazS8Jtl8lyL9kA8VhnStQfxqL+d82JftkQuBLerpphKKnaFGXk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776074858; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jqlmsgW1ZXF9UwTaqAX0MQN18po3bOo3czPFfe39k1Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=eWbo9qyeVwFFaY1DuuSJ33vD5WrvaVi/aV+uToAp3ONOkNf6Y6RvYGHbz2y49YYgI7XjUKejv7kZrLmQBu1mIgXMUpqDdZa8ANI9u0QeG3Nke18RnJsuu7lwbVs5s1+3Tv+6VxO08tf7c2cPwME/TMFlum/udjD1BUKAiq51QV8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=toke.dk; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=toke.dk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.145.95.4 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=toke.dk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=toke.dk From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; dkim=none To: phx Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/sched: sch_cake: fix NAT destination port not being updated in cake_update_flowkeys In-Reply-To: References: <20260413084715.70169-1-phx0fer@gmail.com> <874ilfdwoe.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:07:34 +0200 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87y0ircgwp.fsf@toke.dk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain phx writes: > You're right, "vulnerability" is too strong - it's a correctness > bug, not a security issue. Thanks for picking it up. Cool. Could you please re-send with an updated commit message? Thanks! -Toke pw-bot: cr