From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E9A6387372; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 16:14:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772468049; cv=none; b=A2CHjJgARZDxY9NdotAS0So5jaTy61OO6VNdWv3fViUufQFOsWi5qmJQ1kktONrhDKOE/YwhX/OLHz22mwEeDIwYKp8KivQZ1gpkKnAFshvX/ajRTb5KUEiXYMihu8YaC2cLG/iQyXHvJIMuAtYrMlEVA2MmT5kz87SnRM070AY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772468049; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GllBRQ+/5lw/YKIoqIlltaCvkXN3t0K2P1wecZTMdfo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=j8/8FJXbtPcyYCvRx1OjvnFxC70LLBIx57cfUCBPzTr1LJeI7/WffZi0LJ7dyddFqaax3f/H76XkRoineRQCTvUntb6kbTe2FjIGOP/6Fyuj70KF0fFAoRbqTlttiXXG+KJsMrL7RASBrvXCSByBAgW9DLlGn6e2dPRcGUzp3jI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=f8pn8U6F; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="f8pn8U6F" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 5854040C69 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1772468041; bh=GllBRQ+/5lw/YKIoqIlltaCvkXN3t0K2P1wecZTMdfo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=f8pn8U6FA7kUP/r8iFJZ4rWUypHnzoaqHWxdAGjfHjokYaiGJKCr7IU0F2JeN/8Fw azpeD8ldqGCxtqmHWLxHS49TZl0QI+PrcVa1ESn/HNUJLsJpACllhhxKlZ7WWhWA0G 4aJvqrqR8VuLoM4+Eg+rb1g/Si03GSmPlar/FE1+ppa4Qndh/WT11KisZJg8mqwbVh /WzQmizJRbq2GmBEJHki9LsLvF6IsnP61jEwvwgciTs1BsM2J6ZOLVi4QFAAp0/ZhL xDEN8yE0rRR0o2SHCha4a+omT/xNujvFQOxlgrR+kzRwwpwg0ORD4R3MLY+vZKFmpC 3fI6jawrtR2kg== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5854040C69; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 16:14:01 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Alexander Lobakin , Kees Cook , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Aleksandr Loktionov , Randy Dunlap , Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 00/38] docs: several improvements to kernel-doc In-Reply-To: <20260302165433.27f11148@localhost> References: <87sear2kbm.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> <20260302165433.27f11148@localhost> Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2026 09:14:00 -0700 Message-ID: <87y0kaw6nr.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > So, instead of merging this patchset, I'll be sending you > a smaller series with the basic stuff, in a way that it would > be easier to review. My plan is to send patches along this week > on smaller chunks, and after checking the differences before/after, > in terms of man/rst/error output. OK... *whew* ... that sounds like a better way to proceed :) Thanks, jon