From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F12EC5810D for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 13:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707916998; cv=none; b=nXM6oTazT4Mj+4swkEpHa3nA2Jc21kmB5/n/au82eieXcxh7SziZN5+3JmibXksVR761xIFF8M6M+a60xs1YbHJKFKouAQUVqF++WTFNUGN7pJqL6a1UGKCW7CYFIMsMGcb12/T1kJXrK7Re17CLVtuBP9XGJdOJjTZcoQg22nQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707916998; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HNraHWOZNH+3RvOHMr8xVWNpbzsIA2kUslt7E3CDhMI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FKtKHbNhYWndt+IB48FRcr68RLKTQNWhmbsneMwbp7pTLK9mq1DO6vOLrrNUpiuDrbBuz20oFFe/l/8L17+9KtcipVva8dA7koa1xafXuyc3rZEknolW7Dt4qlunWBrugnheISn05rBLZtNLQEAp7b0xzdW577StNM3fToXCRw4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=GisxKNhP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="GisxKNhP" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1707916995; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Un0QKPb4jdgmT6FE6UlUFtmk4ArcRKmDsqNoetoVwlY=; b=GisxKNhP3Qz0BQ+j5yL7OyEi+0bPPMu4gwbCIjEe32LFPwloGewmOkjCK2Uf2RP2J/t0C5 i0tHT7/+lINTdkwNk9cApkUAHe+ZnlENQYKhbr7jENJ1QUOAmWjlN5snuZvbEF3GgJHg00 5ya0/RgoMzrbDDPI6cBHnsSCns+4PJw= Received: from mail-ej1-f72.google.com (mail-ej1-f72.google.com [209.85.218.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-340-mtaO_p68NiGwpcELSI3lSg-1; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 08:23:12 -0500 X-MC-Unique: mtaO_p68NiGwpcELSI3lSg-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f72.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a3120029877so85259666b.1 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:23:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1707916991; x=1708521791; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Un0QKPb4jdgmT6FE6UlUFtmk4ArcRKmDsqNoetoVwlY=; b=QXZIneK1lYRNjAIjp7ks+TWRzj/g6mrGqYbLibtkM62DSbSVibLYePdKRzYas/FDuy yVsEHtp+rbrmPtQeK4TiPSVPlyC6lHX6sBucc5xhYiY9U0ACJItQNBH2/aE2CyTFIAvR EhXcofXgXiENM9VdW1AId7XF7eB1U8ivK4WvpLYnZxK7J57AawKxmVvVZt+aE8jV38gn EknVk1EqK9XPwqzxPC4zy3vhif8xI3UgtVblY0zdAYylu7Uz5BtvhcVs6pZUa3abYU8z mc0xdxClGOBdOkW8u8R8BwJ8Qyp0l4nwySeeTe+hGZ96XOnzKEjdF3Mn/rEq8lw8uxwP 6SFg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVEPosMgbkqjIiMh2mIEMMy+MZcXJXIT6/CySQJHXBFmHDSowT6XPUvps7vNcNtWTrdbVUjDPqS2yMt3SF1LV4IXutIGonP X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwDVtAx7PjFz7srbPMcO3kSxU3PQS2X1vtd+JQ9Wr8KSCj43nyH k6VY2tvxIvw5D/JnZpmp21Zpy1vCSLUFiL8EtdgMTWYTBewb6uAQFshiEn9e0DOx46xyTjPVFeM pZi66zJ4OqpLZr3J84CGrnmcf4e3sWCYdx4J7+xtp3chvDFEJc43jzg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1c21:b0:a38:4dc0:22f9 with SMTP id nc33-20020a1709071c2100b00a384dc022f9mr2087115ejc.4.1707916991520; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:23:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGUhTw8vtSivb9TAW8WtFvo5Bbn9Fb0HKGxLEpjNn3TOAQbWkbLicACvPPyh0Yr8VXL4hnFdA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1c21:b0:a38:4dc0:22f9 with SMTP id nc33-20020a1709071c2100b00a384dc022f9mr2087084ejc.4.1707916991244; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:23:11 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; 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 Received: from alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk ([2a0c:4d80:42:443::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id cw9-20020a170907160900b00a3d559c6113sm439165ejd.204.2024.02.14.05.23.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Feb 2024 05:23:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9728310F57A4; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 14:23:10 +0100 (CET) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Jesper Dangaard Brouer Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFQ=?= =?utf-8?B?w7ZwZWw=?= , "David S. Miller" , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , Daniel Borkmann , Eric Dumazet , Hao Luo , Jakub Kicinski , Jiri Olsa , John Fastabend , Jonathan Lemon , KP Singh , Maciej Fijalkowski , Magnus Karlsson , Martin KaFai Lau , Paolo Abeni , Peter Zijlstra , Song Liu , Stanislav Fomichev , Thomas Gleixner , Yonghong Song Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 1/2] net: Reference bpf_redirect_info via task_struct on PREEMPT_RT. In-Reply-To: <20240214121921.VJJ2bCBE@linutronix.de> References: <20240213145923.2552753-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20240213145923.2552753-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <66d9ee60-fbe3-4444-b98d-887845d4c187@kernel.org> <20240214121921.VJJ2bCBE@linutronix.de> X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 14:23:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87y1bndvsx.fsf@toke.dk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes: > On 2024-02-13 21:50:51 [+0100], Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: >> I generally like the idea around bpf_xdp_storage. >> >> I only skimmed the code, but noticed some extra if-statements (for >> !NULL). I don't think they will make a difference, but I know Toke want >> me to test it... > > I've been looking at the assembly for the return value of > bpf_redirect_info() and there is a NULL pointer check. I hoped it was > obvious to be nun-NULL because it is a static struct. > > Should this become a problem I could add > "__attribute__((returns_nonnull))" to the declaration of the function > which will optimize the NULL check away. If we know the function will never return NULL (I was wondering about that, actually), why have the check in the C code at all? Couldn't we just omit it entirely instead of relying on the compiler to optimise it out? -Toke