netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@gmail.com>,
	Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] veth: refine napi usage
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 16:57:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y2drtsic.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b241da0e8aa31773472591e219ada3632a84dfbb.1617965243.git.pabeni@redhat.com>

Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> writes:

> After the previous patch, when enabling GRO, locally generated
> TCP traffic experiences some measurable overhead, as it traverses
> the GRO engine without any chance of aggregation.
>
> This change refine the NAPI receive path admission test, to avoid
> unnecessary GRO overhead in most scenarios, when GRO is enabled
> on a veth peer.
>
> Only skbs that are eligible for aggregation enter the GRO layer,
> the others will go through the traditional receive path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/veth.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/veth.c b/drivers/net/veth.c
> index ca44e82d1edeb..85f90f33d437e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/veth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/veth.c
> @@ -282,6 +282,25 @@ static int veth_forward_skb(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
>  		netif_rx(skb);
>  }
>  
> +/* return true if the specified skb has chances of GRO aggregation
> + * Don't strive for accuracy, but try to avoid GRO overhead in the most
> + * common scenarios.
> + * When XDP is enabled, all traffic is considered eligible, as the xmit
> + * device has TSO off.
> + * When TSO is enabled on the xmit device, we are likely interested only
> + * in UDP aggregation, explicitly check for that if the skb is suspected
> + * - the sock_wfree destructor is used by UDP, ICMP and XDP sockets -
> + * to belong to locally generated UDP traffic.
> + */
> +static bool veth_skb_is_eligible_for_gro(const struct net_device *dev,
> +					 const struct net_device *rcv,
> +					 const struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	return !(dev->features & NETIF_F_ALL_TSO) ||
> +		(skb->destructor == sock_wfree &&
> +		 rcv->features & (NETIF_F_GRO_FRAGLIST | NETIF_F_GRO_UDP_FWD));
> +}
> +
>  static netdev_tx_t veth_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct veth_priv *rcv_priv, *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> @@ -305,8 +324,10 @@ static netdev_tx_t veth_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>  
>  		/* The napi pointer is available when an XDP program is
>  		 * attached or when GRO is enabled
> +		 * Don't bother with napi/GRO if the skb can't be aggregated
>  		 */
> -		use_napi = rcu_access_pointer(rq->napi);
> +		use_napi = rcu_access_pointer(rq->napi) &&
> +			   veth_skb_is_eligible_for_gro(dev, rcv, skb);
>  		skb_record_rx_queue(skb, rxq);
>  	}

You just changed the 'xdp_rcv' check to this use_napi, and now you're
conditioning it on GRO eligibility, so doesn't this break XDP if that
was the reason NAPI was turned on in the first place?

-Toke


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-09 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-09 11:04 [PATCH net-next 0/4] veth: allow GRO even without XDP Paolo Abeni
2021-04-09 11:04 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] veth: use skb_orphan_partial instead of skb_orphan Paolo Abeni
2021-04-09 11:04 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] veth: allow enabling NAPI even without XDP Paolo Abeni
2021-04-09 14:58   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-04-09 15:20     ` Paolo Abeni
2021-04-16 15:29       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-04-16 17:26         ` Paolo Abeni
2021-04-16 18:19           ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-04-09 11:04 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] veth: refine napi usage Paolo Abeni
2021-04-09 14:57   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2021-04-09 15:07     ` Paolo Abeni
2021-04-09 15:18       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-04-09 11:04 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] self-tests: add veth tests Paolo Abeni
2021-04-12  0:10 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] veth: allow GRO even without XDP patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y2drtsic.fsf@toke.dk \
    --to=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=toshiaki.makita1@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).