netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <ldir@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>,
	ldir@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, stephen@networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC iproute2-next v4] tc: add support for action act_ctinfo
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2019 22:14:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y32ifmug.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190603135040.75408-1-ldir@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>

Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <ldir@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> writes:

> ctinfo is an action restoring data stored in conntrack marks to various
> fields.  At present it has two independent modes of operation,
> restoration of DSCP into IPv4/v6 diffserv and restoration of conntrack
> marks into packet skb marks.
>
> It understands a number of parameters specific to this action in
> additional to the usual action syntax.  Each operating mode is
> independent of the other so all options are optional, however not
> specifying at least one mode is a bit pointless.
>
> Usage: ... ctinfo [dscp mask [statemask]] [cpmark [mask]] [zone ZONE]
> 		  [CONTROL] [index <INDEX>]
>
> DSCP mode
>
> dscp enables copying of a DSCP store in the conntrack mark into the
> ipv4/v6 diffserv field.  The mask is a 32bit field and specifies where
> in the conntrack mark the DSCP value is stored.  It must be 6 contiguous
> bits long, e.g. 0xfc000000 would restore the DSCP from the upper 6 bits
> of the conntrack mark.
>
> The DSCP copying may be optionally controlled by a statemask.  The
> statemask is a 32bit field, usually with a single bit set and must not
> overlap the dscp mask.  The DSCP restore operation will only take place
> if the corresponding bit/s in conntrack mark yield a non zero result.
>
> eg. dscp 0xfc000000/0x01000000 would retrieve the DSCP from the top 6
> bits, whilst using bit 25 as a flag to do so.  Bit 26 is unused in this
> example.
>
> CPMARK mode
>
> cpmark enables copying of the conntrack mark to the packet skb mark.  In
> this mode it is completely equivalent to the existing act_connmark.
> Additional functionality is provided by the optional mask parameter,
> whereby the stored conntrack mark is logically anded with the cpmark
> mask before being stored into skb mark.  This allows shared usage of the
> conntrack mark between applications.
>
> eg. cpmark 0x00ffffff would restore only the lower 24 bits of the
> conntrack mark, thus may be useful in the event that the upper 8 bits
> are used by the DSCP function.
>
> Usage: ... ctinfo [dscp mask [statemask]] [cpmark [mask]] [zone ZONE]
> 		  [CONTROL] [index <INDEX>]
> where :
> 	dscp MASK is the bitmask to restore DSCP
> 	     STATEMASK is the bitmask to determine conditional restoring
> 	cpmark MASK mask applied to restored packet mark
> 	ZONE is the conntrack zone
> 	CONTROL := reclassify | pipe | drop | continue | ok |
> 		   goto chain <CHAIN_INDEX>
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <ldir@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
>
> ---
> v2 - fix whitespace issue in pkt_cls
>      fix most warnings from checkpatch - some lines still over 80 chars
>      due to long TLV names.
> v3 - fix some dangling else warnings.
>      refactor stats printing to please checkpatch.
>      send zone TLV even if default '0' zone.
>      now checkpatch clean even though I think some of the formatting
>      is horrible :-)
>      sending via google's smtp 'cos MS' exchange office365 appears
>      to mangle patches from git send-email.
> v4 - use the NEXT_ARG macros throughout.
>      fix printing typo use 'cpmark' instead of 'mark'.
>      use space separator between dscp mask & optional statemask and
>      update usage as a result.
>      validate dscp mask & statemask and print friendlier warnings
>      than "invalid".
>      fix cpmark option default value handling bug.

No further comments on this version; you should probably re-submit
without the RFC tag, though.

Feel free to add my

Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>

when you do...

-Toke

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-03 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-31  8:10 [PATCH RFC iproute2-next v2] tc: add support for act ctinfo ldir.kdb
2019-06-02  7:33 ` Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-06-02 18:50 ` [PATCH RFC iproute2-next v3] tc: add support for action act_ctinfo Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-06-02 20:39   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-06-02 21:55     ` Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-06-03  9:15       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-06-03 13:50   ` [PATCH RFC iproute2-next v4] " Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2019-06-03 20:14     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2019-06-05 18:23     ` Joe Perches
2019-06-05 18:54       ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y32ifmug.fsf@toke.dk \
    --to=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=ldir@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).