From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
To: Zang MingJie <zealot0630@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:50:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y4hjgy6p.fsf@stressinduktion.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOrge3pSQ7eck14biTncjOyGD-DKY0DvRr7JKpS3BowoSDry-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
Zang MingJie <zealot0630@gmail.com> writes:
> Here comes several options:
>
> 1. reject local next hop w/ EINVAL
> 2. delete route when local next hop removed
Will also cause some people to complain.
> 3. transition between RT_SCOPE_HOST amd RT_SCOPE_LINK
I don't understand the scope transition. I know Alex mentioned it for
the first time. Maybe he can explain?
> 4. document it
I prefer that one :)
> which one should we choose ?
>
> 1 will definitely cause compatibility problem
Agreed.
> 2 is the easiest solution
Will definietely cause some people to complain.
Bye,
Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-10 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAOrge3qi=7YPRO+VeCDvHsm_7SFC4Y=+JpwQtwAV3zk_q4fEAw@mail.gmail.com>
2015-08-05 9:06 ` [BUG] net/ipv4: inconsistent routing table Daniel Borkmann
2015-08-05 17:45 ` Alexander Duyck
2015-08-06 10:13 ` Zang MingJie
2015-08-06 19:43 ` Alexander Duyck
2015-08-07 8:23 ` Zang MingJie
2015-08-07 16:08 ` Alexander Duyck
2015-08-07 17:00 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
[not found] ` <CAOrge3qxOb_XrspuvYjV0pDDxUUoqGE3690KUQGoxZMxuD-NRQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-08-08 10:36 ` Zang MingJie
2015-08-10 9:16 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-08-10 10:51 ` Zang MingJie
2015-08-10 11:50 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa [this message]
2015-08-11 20:52 ` Alexander Duyck
2015-08-11 21:15 ` David Miller
2015-08-12 8:14 ` Zang MingJie
2015-08-12 15:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y4hjgy6p.fsf@stressinduktion.org \
--to=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zealot0630@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).