From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [patch iproute2 1/6] iproute2: ipa: show switch id Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:15:04 -0600 Message-ID: <87y4qne6if.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> References: <1417683438-10935-1-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> <1417683438-10935-2-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, andy@greyhouse.net, tgraf@suug.ch, dborkman@redhat.com, ogerlitz@mellanox.com, jesse@nicira.com, pshelar@nicira.com, azhou@nicira.com, ben@decadent.org.uk, stephen@networkplumber.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, vyasevic@redhat.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, john.r.fastabend@intel.com, edumazet@google.com, jhs@mojatatu.com, sfeldma@gmail.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, linville@tuxdriver.com, jasowang@redhat.com, nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com, buytenh@wantstofly.org, aviadr@mellanox.com, nbd@openwrt.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, Neil.Jerram@metaswitch.com, ronye@mellanox.com, simon.horman@netronome.com, alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com, john.ronciak@intel.com, mleitner@redhat.com, shrijeet@gmail.com, gospo@cumulusnetworks.com, bcrl@kvack.org, hemal@broadcom.c To: Jiri Pirko Return-path: Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:43629 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932212AbaLDQRX (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2014 11:17:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1417683438-10935-2-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> (Jiri Pirko's message of "Thu, 4 Dec 2014 09:57:13 +0100") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jiri Pirko writes: Would someone please explain to me what a switch id is? I looked in the kernel source, and I looked here and while I know switches I don't have a clue what a switch id is. My primary concern at this point is that you have introduced a global identifier that is isn't a hardware property (it certainly does not look like a mac address) and that is unique across network namespaces and thus breaks checkpoint/restart (aka CRIU). Also what in the world does PHYS mean in IFLA_PHYS_SWITCH_ID? Does that mean we can't have a purely software implementation of this interface? Given that we will want a software implementation at some point including PHYS in the name seems completely wrong. > Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko > --- > include/linux/if_link.h | 1 + > ip/ipaddress.c | 8 ++++++++ > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/if_link.h b/include/linux/if_link.h > index 4732063..a6e2594 100644 > --- a/include/linux/if_link.h > +++ b/include/linux/if_link.h > @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ enum { > IFLA_CARRIER, > IFLA_PHYS_PORT_ID, > IFLA_CARRIER_CHANGES, > + IFLA_PHYS_SWITCH_ID, > __IFLA_MAX > }; > > diff --git a/ip/ipaddress.c b/ip/ipaddress.c > index 4d99324..bd36a07 100644 > --- a/ip/ipaddress.c > +++ b/ip/ipaddress.c > @@ -589,6 +589,14 @@ int print_linkinfo(const struct sockaddr_nl *who, > b1, sizeof(b1))); > } > > + if (tb[IFLA_PHYS_SWITCH_ID]) { > + SPRINT_BUF(b1); > + fprintf(fp, "switchid %s ", > + hexstring_n2a(RTA_DATA(tb[IFLA_PHYS_SWITCH_ID]), > + RTA_PAYLOAD(tb[IFLA_PHYS_SWITCH_ID]), > + b1, sizeof(b1))); > + } > + > if (tb[IFLA_OPERSTATE]) > print_operstate(fp, rta_getattr_u8(tb[IFLA_OPERSTATE]));