From: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>
To: Emil Goode <emilgoode@gmail.com>
Cc: Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@shawell.net>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Freddy Xin <freddy@asix.com.tw>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
Liu Junliang <liujunliang_ljl@163.com>,
Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usbnet: remove generic hard_header_len check
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:36:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y51f2qip.fsf@nemi.mork.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140213112016.GA4245@lianli> (Emil Goode's message of "Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:20:16 +0100")
Emil Goode <emilgoode@gmail.com> writes:
> Yes I should have put a comment in the changelog about this. All skbs that
> are passed to rx_process have their state set to rx_cleanup and just because
> the skb was cloned doesn't mean that we should free the original in a
> different way. As it is I think we are acctually missing a call to
> usb_free_urb that is called on the common rx_cleanup path.
Yes, I wondered about that as well, thinking that this part actually
should be a separate patch for net+stable.
But then I wondered how we could possibly have had a bug like that
living here for so long, and the answer is we haven't. You don't want
to free the URB. It is already resubmitted with a different skb as its
buffer. The call to usb_free_urb in the rx_cleanup path is there only
for the cases where the URB is not resubmitted. The rx_complete callback
is controlling this by updating entry->urb as appropriate. So it will
always be NULL if rx_process is called, and the call to usb_free_urb has
no effect.
Rearranging this code to always take the same cleanup path is still a
very nice cleanup IMHO.
Bjørn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-13 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-13 0:03 [PATCH] usbnet: remove generic hard_header_len check Emil Goode
2014-02-13 9:05 ` Bjørn Mork
2014-02-13 11:20 ` Emil Goode
2014-02-13 11:36 ` Bjørn Mork [this message]
2014-02-13 11:49 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y51f2qip.fsf@nemi.mork.no \
--to=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=emilgoode@gmail.com \
--cc=freddy@asix.com.tw \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liujunliang_ljl@163.com \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=octavian.purdila@intel.com \
--cc=oneukum@suse.de \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=steve.glendinning@shawell.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).