From: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
To: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
horms@kernel.org, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v5 12/12] iavf: add support for Rx timestamps to hotpath
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:12:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zftqctla.fsf@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240418052500.50678-13-mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com>
On Thu, 18 Apr, 2024 01:25:00 -0400 Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com> wrote:
> From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
>
> Add support for receive timestamps to the Rx hotpath. This support only
> works when using the flexible descriptor format, so make sure that we
> request this format by default if we have receive timestamp support
> available in the PTP capabilities.
>
> In order to report the timestamps to userspace, we need to perform
> timestamp extension. The Rx descriptor does actually contain the "40
> bit" timestamp. However, upper 32 bits which contain nanoseconds are
> conveniently stored separately in the descriptor. We could extract the
> 32bits and lower 8 bits, then perform a bitwise OR to calculate the
> 40bit value. This makes no sense, because the timestamp extension
> algorithm would simply discard the lower 8 bits anyways.
>
> Thus, implement timestamp extension as iavf_ptp_extend_32b_timestamp(),
> and extract and forward only the 32bits of nominal nanoseconds.
>
> Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-18 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-18 5:24 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v5 00/12] Add support for Rx timestamping for both ice and iavf drivers Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-18 5:24 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v5 01/12] virtchnl: add support for enabling PTP on iAVF Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-18 18:49 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-04-18 5:24 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v5 02/12] ice: support Rx timestamp on flex descriptor Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-18 18:57 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-04-22 9:34 ` Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-18 5:24 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v5 03/12] virtchnl: add enumeration for the rxdid format Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-18 19:05 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-04-18 5:24 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v5 04/12] iavf: add support for negotiating flexible RXDID format Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-18 19:11 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-04-22 9:34 ` Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-18 5:24 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v5 05/12] iavf: negotiate PTP capabilities Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-18 19:16 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-04-22 9:33 ` Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-18 5:24 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v5 06/12] iavf: add initial framework for registering PTP clock Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-18 19:28 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-04-22 9:29 ` Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-18 5:24 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v5 07/12] iavf: add support for indirect access to PHC time Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-18 19:43 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-04-18 5:24 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v5 08/12] iavf: periodically cache " Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-18 19:51 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-04-22 9:23 ` Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-24 22:03 ` Keller, Jacob E
2024-04-25 10:52 ` Przemek Kitszel
2024-04-25 16:28 ` Keller, Jacob E
2024-04-25 17:10 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-04-18 5:24 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v5 09/12] iavf: refactor iavf_clean_rx_irq to support legacy and flex descriptors Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-18 20:00 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-04-22 9:22 ` Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-23 10:51 ` Sunil Kovvuri Goutham
2024-04-26 7:15 ` Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-18 5:24 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v5 10/12] iavf: Implement checking DD desc field Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-18 20:07 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-04-18 5:24 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v5 11/12] iavf: handle SIOCSHWTSTAMP and SIOCGHWTSTAMP Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-18 20:08 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-04-18 5:25 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v5 12/12] iavf: add support for Rx timestamps to hotpath Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-18 20:12 ` Rahul Rameshbabu [this message]
2024-04-23 10:47 ` Sunil Kovvuri Goutham
2024-04-18 20:19 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v5 00/12] Add support for Rx timestamping for both ice and iavf drivers Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-04-22 9:37 ` Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-04-23 5:57 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-04-23 6:08 ` Mateusz Polchlopek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zftqctla.fsf@nvidia.com \
--to=rrameshbabu@nvidia.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wojciech.drewek@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).