netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Enable PTP receive for mv88e6390
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 15:20:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zgapkv93.fsf@kurt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y7678lFYTzDFc27j@lunn.ch>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1463 bytes --]

On Wed Jan 11 2023, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 09:04:17AM +0100, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
>> The switch receives management traffic such as STP and LLDP. However, PTP
>> messages are not received, only transmitted.
>> 
>> Ideally, the switch would trap all PTP messages to the management CPU. This
>> particular switch has a PTP block which identifies PTP messages and traps them
>> to a dedicated port. There is a register to program this destination. This is
>> not used at the moment.
>> 
>> Therefore, program it to the same port as the MGMT traffic is trapped to. This
>> allows to receive PTP messages as soon as timestamping is enabled.
>> 
>> In addition, the datasheet mentions that this register is not valid e.g. for
>> 6190 variants. So, add a new cpu port method for 6390 which programs the MGTM
>> and PTP destination.
>
> The mv88e6190x_ops and ops mv88e6190_ops structure does not have a
> ptp_ops member. So these two devices do not support PTP.
>
> I think it would be cleaner to implement setting the PTP MGMT port as
> part of the ptp_ops. Maybe add a new op, which is called from
> mv88e6xxx_ptp_setup() if set?

OK, can do. The 6390 currently uses mv88e6352_ptp_ops. This one is used
by a lot of other devices, too. For instance, the 6341 doesn't have this
PTP MGMT port, but uses the same ops structure. Thus, I'd have to
introduce a new ptp ops structure for both 6390 devices.

Thanks,
Kurt

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 861 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2023-01-11 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-11  8:04 [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Enable PTP receive for mv88e6390 Kurt Kanzenbach
2023-01-11 13:38 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-01-11 14:20   ` Kurt Kanzenbach [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zgapkv93.fsf@kurt \
    --to=kurt@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).