From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/1] Allow 0.0.0.0/8 as a valid address range
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 18:52:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zhmlctqz.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1560442237-6336-2-git-send-email-dave.taht@gmail.com>
Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes:
> The longstanding prohibition against using 0.0.0.0/8 dates back
> to two issues with the early internet.
>
> There was an interoperability problem with BSD 4.2 in 1984, fixed in
> BSD 4.3 in 1986. BSD 4.2 has long since been retired.
>
> Secondly, addresses of the form 0.x.y.z were initially defined only as
> a source address in an ICMP datagram, indicating "node number x.y.z on
> this IPv4 network", by nodes that know their address on their local
> network, but do not yet know their network prefix, in RFC0792 (page
> 19). This usage of 0.x.y.z was later repealed in RFC1122 (section
> 3.2.2.7), because the original ICMP-based mechanism for learning the
> network prefix was unworkable on many networks such as Ethernet (which
> have longer addresses that would not fit into the 24 "node number"
> bits). Modern networks use reverse ARP (RFC0903) or BOOTP (RFC0951)
> or DHCP (RFC2131) to find their full 32-bit address and CIDR netmask
> (and other parameters such as default gateways). 0.x.y.z has had
> 16,777,215 addresses in 0.0.0.0/8 space left unused and reserved for
> future use, since 1989.
>
> This patch allows for these 16m new IPv4 addresses to appear within
> a box or on the wire. Layer 2 switches don't care.
>
> 0.0.0.0/32 is still prohibited, of course.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Well, I see no reason why we shouldn't allow this.
Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-13 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-13 16:10 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/1] Allow 0.0.0.0/8 as a valid address range Dave Taht
2019-06-13 16:10 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/1] " Dave Taht
2019-06-13 16:52 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zhmlctqz.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).