From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04833C433FE for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 21:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236262AbhK1VsK (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Nov 2021 16:48:10 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:47940 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236303AbhK1VqK (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Nov 2021 16:46:10 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 1ASKud1L006735; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 21:42:50 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : to : cc : references : from : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=53T3DVQXoOmGk0Ru/bhYIr21fbVr8KqJ17GtJgDRD9I=; b=l3n4T7on+31LPEFelJ6Pu/7akDMPbgrPmUOsJ5gi1kWmekxE1GKlbF7A3RI+PkswfSdx mKZNTlf10solSPUSonUdJJt/ns8QxHSayq41bNSXXj/s43SmYlQNSPFGmb6F+lFjC0ij SzNejjGEvlXdgSnJ0Z9Bgn0rzyje+SGqqTZCQOjqGoXSVtqMTViKUBIa24nNln+MO2jB FZ0GOF4fcPbMJXPnL4B1q1EoqSDSQ129vb7ux37q811fQgvaaEVCxiA7PortAs+YPC21 LuSkZV9+X5Q1OKG+RWZWE3JrLb7spqU3aDoCg+MfSRucwpd0W1te8g7zRElkMFQbGBPG kA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3cmh8d8f2n-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 28 Nov 2021 21:42:50 +0000 Received: from m0098419.ppops.net (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 1ASLeB8R032291; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 21:42:49 GMT Received: from ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (46.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.70]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3cmh8d8f2a-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 28 Nov 2021 21:42:49 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 1ASLbHKJ028231; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 21:42:48 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3ckca96fq8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 28 Nov 2021 21:42:48 +0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 1ASLgj7U59113762 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 28 Nov 2021 21:42:45 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56A6A405B; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 21:42:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D53FA4054; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 21:42:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.145.59.207] (unknown [9.145.59.207]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2021 21:42:45 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <883f1ab1-21be-9019-d8c6-3942a0b8588c@linux.ibm.com> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 22:42:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: Clear memory when release and reuse buffer Content-Language: en-US To: Jakub Kicinski , Tony Lu Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org References: <20211125122858.90726-1-tonylu@linux.alibaba.com> <20211126112855.37274cb7@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> From: Karsten Graul Organization: IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH In-Reply-To: <20211126112855.37274cb7@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: gArUDayhvrN29MTxd2k2bNRQBnzh0YlT X-Proofpoint-GUID: RbmPb3ySMcWuxDcUW-fEtS-yD77t07at X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-11-28_07,2021-11-28_01,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2110150000 definitions=main-2111280126 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On 26/11/2021 20:28, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > The tag in the subject seems incorrect, we tag things as [PATCH net] > if they are fixes, and as [PATCH net-next] if they are new features, > code refactoring or performance improvements. > > Is this a fix for a regression? In which case we need a Fixes tag to > indicate where it was introduced. Otherwise it needs to be tagged as > [PATCH net-next]. > > I'm assuming Karsten will take it via his tree, otherwise you'll need > to repost. > We are testing this change atm and will submit it via our tree. Very nice change, I like it!