From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
To: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] xen-netback: remove pointless clause from if statement
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:52:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <885249016.20140327135218@eikelenboom.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395922988-37702-2-git-send-email-paul.durrant@citrix.com>
Thursday, March 27, 2014, 1:23:06 PM, you wrote:
> This patch removes a test in start_new_rx_buffer() that checks whether
> a copy operation is less than MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET in length, since
> MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET is defined to be PAGE_SIZE and the only caller of
> start_new_rx_buffer() already limits copy operations to PAGE_SIZE or less.
> Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
> Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
> ---
> drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> index 438d0c0..befc413 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> @@ -192,8 +192,7 @@ static bool start_new_rx_buffer(int offset, unsigned long size, int head)
> * into multiple copies tend to give large frags their
> * own buffers as before.
> */
> - if ((offset + size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) &&
> - (size <= MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) && offset && !head)
> + if ((offset + size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) && offset && !head)
> return true;
>
> return false;
Will put this through the test now ..
--
Sander
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-27 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-27 12:23 [PATCH net 0/3] xen-netback: fix rx slot estimation Paul Durrant
2014-03-27 12:23 ` [PATCH net 1/3] xen-netback: remove pointless clause from if statement Paul Durrant
2014-03-27 12:24 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-27 12:52 ` Sander Eikelenboom [this message]
2014-03-27 12:23 ` [PATCH net 2/3] xen-netback: worse-case estimate in xenvif_rx_action is underestimating Paul Durrant
2014-03-27 12:27 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-27 12:29 ` Paul Durrant
2014-03-27 12:23 ` [PATCH net 3/3] xen-netback: BUG_ON in xenvif_rx_action() not catching overflow Paul Durrant
2014-03-27 12:28 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-27 12:30 ` Paul Durrant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=885249016.20140327135218@eikelenboom.it \
--to=linux@eikelenboom.it \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox