From: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: davicom: dm9000: switch to using gpiod API
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 15:33:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <88VJLR.GYSEKGBPLGZC1@crapouillou.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220906204922.3789922-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Hi Dmitry,
Le mar. 6 sept. 2022 à 13:49:20 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> a écrit :
> This patch switches the driver away from legacy gpio/of_gpio API to
> gpiod API, and removes use of of_get_named_gpio_flags() which I want
> to
> make private to gpiolib.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/davicom/dm9000.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/davicom/dm9000.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/davicom/dm9000.c
> index 77229e53b04e..c85a6ebd79fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/davicom/dm9000.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/davicom/dm9000.c
> @@ -28,8 +28,7 @@
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> -#include <linux/gpio.h>
> -#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
>
> #include <asm/delay.h>
> #include <asm/irq.h>
> @@ -1421,8 +1420,7 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> int iosize;
> int i;
> u32 id_val;
> - int reset_gpios;
> - enum of_gpio_flags flags;
> + struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio;
> struct regulator *power;
> bool inv_mac_addr = false;
> u8 addr[ETH_ALEN];
> @@ -1442,20 +1440,24 @@ dm9000_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dev_dbg(dev, "regulator enabled\n");
> }
>
> - reset_gpios = of_get_named_gpio_flags(dev->of_node, "reset-gpios",
> 0,
> - &flags);
> - if (gpio_is_valid(reset_gpios)) {
> - ret = devm_gpio_request_one(dev, reset_gpios, flags,
> - "dm9000_reset");
> + reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(reset_gpio);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to request reset gpio: %d\n", ret);
> + goto out_regulator_disable;
> + }
> +
> + if (reset_gpio) {
> + ret = gpiod_set_consumer_name(reset_gpio, "dm9000_reset");
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to request reset gpio %d: %d\n",
> - reset_gpios, ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to set reset gpio name: %d\n",
> + ret);
> goto out_regulator_disable;
> }
>
> /* According to manual PWRST# Low Period Min 1ms */
> msleep(2);
> - gpio_set_value(reset_gpios, 1);
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(reset_gpio, 0);
Why is that 1 magically turned into a 0?
On my CI20 board I can't get the DM9000 chip to probe correctly with
this patch (it fails to read the ID).
If I revert this patch then everything works fine.
Cheers,
-Paul
> /* Needs 3ms to read eeprom when PWRST is deasserted */
> msleep(4);
> }
> --
> 2.37.2.789.g6183377224-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-18 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-06 20:49 [PATCH 1/3] net: davicom: dm9000: switch to using gpiod API Dmitry Torokhov
2022-09-06 20:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] net: ks8851: " Dmitry Torokhov
2022-09-07 21:46 ` Linus Walleij
2022-09-06 20:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] net: phy: spi_ks8895: " Dmitry Torokhov
2022-09-07 21:47 ` Linus Walleij
2022-09-07 21:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] net: davicom: dm9000: " Linus Walleij
2022-09-08 12:06 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-09-15 9:58 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-09-15 10:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2022-11-18 15:33 ` Paul Cercueil [this message]
2022-11-18 15:58 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2022-11-18 16:26 ` Paul Cercueil
2022-11-18 16:30 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2022-11-18 17:50 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-11-18 17:55 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2022-11-21 13:35 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=88VJLR.GYSEKGBPLGZC1@crapouillou.net \
--to=paul@crapouillou.net \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).