netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	edumazet@google.com, ast@fb.com, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	diptanu@fb.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	alexander.duyck@gmail.com
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: bpf: add a test for skb_segment in test_bpf module
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 17:44:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <890b597a-85b6-a3fc-3419-8cace6d0f2b7@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180320232156.3455738-3-yhs@fb.com>



On 03/20/2018 04:21 PM, Yonghong Song wrote:
> Without the previous commit,
> "modprobe test_bpf" will have the following errors:
> ...
> [   98.149165] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [   98.159362] kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:3667!
> [   98.169756] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
> [   98.179370] Modules linked in:
> [   98.179371]  test_bpf(+)
> ...
> which triggers the bug the previous commit intends to fix.
> 
> The skbs are constructed to mimic what mlx5 may generate.
> The packet size/header may not mimic real cases in production. But
> the processing flow is similar.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
> ---
>  lib/test_bpf.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
> index 2efb213..045d7d3 100644
> --- a/lib/test_bpf.c
> +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
> @@ -6574,6 +6574,72 @@ static bool exclude_test(int test_id)
>  	return test_id < test_range[0] || test_id > test_range[1];
>  }
>  
> +static struct sk_buff *build_test_skb(void *page)
> +{
> +	u32 headroom = NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN + ETH_HLEN;
> +	struct sk_buff *skb[2];
> +	int i, data_size = 8;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> +		/* this will set skb[i]->head_frag */
> +		skb[i] = build_skb(page, headroom);
> +		if (!skb[i])
> +			return NULL;

You are using the same virtual address (page) for both skb ?

So we have 2 skbs having skb->head pointing to the same location ?

This is illegal.

Please use instead : skb = dev_alloc_skb(headroom + data_size)

> +
> +		skb_reserve(skb[i], headroom);
> +		skb_put(skb[i], data_size);
> +		skb[i]->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IP);
> +		skb_reset_network_header(skb[i]);
> +		skb_set_mac_header(skb[i], -ETH_HLEN);
> +
> +		skb_add_rx_frag(skb[i], 

skb_shinfo(skb[i])->nr_frags,

0 ?

> +				page, 0, 64, 64);

get_page(page) ?

> +		// skb: skb_headlen(skb[i]): 8, skb[i]->head_frag = 1
> +	}
> +
> +	/* setup shinfo */
> +	skb_shinfo(skb[0])->gso_size = 1448;
> +	skb_shinfo(skb[0])->gso_type = SKB_GSO_TCPV4;
> +	skb_shinfo(skb[0])->gso_type |= SKB_GSO_DODGY;
> +	skb_shinfo(skb[0])->gso_segs = 0;
> +	skb_shinfo(skb[0])->frag_list = skb[1];
> +
> +	/* adjust skb[0]'s len */
> +	skb[0]->len += skb[1]->len;
> +	skb[0]->data_len += skb[1]->data_len;
> +	skb[0]->truesize += skb[1]->truesize;
> +
> +	return skb[0];
> +}
> +
> +static __init int test_skb_segment(void)
> +{
> +	netdev_features_t features;
> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> +	void *page;
> +	int ret = -1;
> +
> +	page = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> +	if (!page) {
> +		pr_info("%s: failed to get_free_page!", __func__);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_GSO_PARTIAL | NETIF_F_IP_CSUM | NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM;
> +	features |= NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
> +	skb = build_test_skb(page);
> +	if (!skb) {
> +		pr_info("%s: failed to build_test_skb", __func__);
> +	} else if (skb_segment(skb, features)) {
> +		ret = 0;
> +		pr_info("%s: success in skb_segment!", __func__);
> +	} else {
> +		pr_info("%s: failed in skb_segment!", __func__);
> +	}
> +	free_page((unsigned long)page);


Where are the skbs freed ?


> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static __init int test_bpf(void)
>  {
>  	int i, err_cnt = 0, pass_cnt = 0;
> @@ -6632,8 +6698,11 @@ static int __init test_bpf_init(void)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	ret = test_bpf();
> -
>  	destroy_bpf_tests();
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = test_skb_segment();
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-21  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-20 23:21 [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] net: permit skb_segment on head_frag frag_list skb Yonghong Song
2018-03-20 23:21 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] " Yonghong Song
2018-03-20 23:50   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-03-21  5:02     ` Yonghong Song
2018-03-21 14:59       ` Alexander Duyck
2018-03-21 20:10         ` Yonghong Song
2018-03-20 23:21 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: bpf: add a test for skb_segment in test_bpf module Yonghong Song
2018-03-21  0:44   ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2018-03-21  5:15     ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=890b597a-85b6-a3fc-3419-8cace6d0f2b7@gmail.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@fb.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=diptanu@fb.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).