RE: [PATCH] rtw89: Fix spelling mistake "Mis-Match" -> "Mismatch"

[Pkshih <pkshih@realtek.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2022 7:43 AM
> To: Pkshih <pkshih@realtek.com>; Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>; David S . Miller <davem@davemloft.net>;
> Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH] rtw89: Fix spelling mistake "Mis-Match" -> "Mismatch"
> 
> There are some spelling mistakes in some literal strings. Fix them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>

> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
> index 07f26718b66f..99abd0fe7f15 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
> @@ -4623,12 +4623,12 @@ static void _show_cx_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
>  	ver_hotfix = FIELD_GET(GENMASK(15, 8), chip->wlcx_desired);
>  	seq_printf(m, "(%s, desired:%d.%d.%d), ",
>  		   (wl->ver_info.fw_coex >= chip->wlcx_desired ?
> -		   "Match" : "Mis-Match"), ver_main, ver_sub, ver_hotfix);
> +		   "Match" : "Mismatch"), ver_main, ver_sub, ver_hotfix);
> 
>  	seq_printf(m, "BT_FW_coex:%d(%s, desired:%d)\n",
>  		   bt->ver_info.fw_coex,
>  		   (bt->ver_info.fw_coex >= chip->btcx_desired ?
> -		   "Match" : "Mis-Match"), chip->btcx_desired);
> +		   "Match" : "Mismatch"), chip->btcx_desired);
> 
>  	if (bt->enable.now && bt->ver_info.fw == 0)
>  		rtw89_btc_fw_en_rpt(rtwdev, RPT_EN_BT_VER_INFO, true);
> @@ -5075,7 +5075,7 @@ static void _show_dm_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
>  	seq_printf(m, "leak_ap:%d, fw_offload:%s%s\n", dm->leak_ap,
>  		   (BTC_CX_FW_OFFLOAD ? "Y" : "N"),
>  		   (dm->wl_fw_cx_offload == BTC_CX_FW_OFFLOAD ?
> -		    "" : "(Mis-Match!!)"));
> +		    "" : "(Mismatch!!)"));
> 
>  	if (dm->rf_trx_para.wl_tx_power == 0xff)
>  		seq_printf(m,
> --
> 2.35.1
> 
> ------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.