From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: davef1624@aol.com Subject: TCP congestion control for fast, short-distance networks ? Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:22:00 -0400 Message-ID: <8C944E41FEE84B1-244-BFF@FWM-D41.sysops.aol.com> References: <20070403091656.769e5368@localhost.localdomain> <200704032113.l33LDVhp025035@expredir6.cites.uiuc.edu> <20070404080743.5e67245a@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: shemminger@linux-foundation.org Return-path: Received: from imo-d05.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.37]:36875 "EHLO imo-d05.mx.aol.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992958AbXDDP16 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:27:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070404080743.5e67245a@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hello, We are currently using both 1 Gb & 10 Gb links, that interconnect several servers that are very *local* to each other. Typical RTT times range from 0.2 ms - 0.3 ms. We are currently using TCP reno - is there a more suitable congestion control algorithm for our application, especially using the 10 Gb links ? (Most of the High-Speed TCP algorithms seem suitable for large RTT, long-distance networks). Thanks David ________________________________________________________________________ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.