From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bond procfs hw addr prints
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 22:06:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8aa4aff4-e1b3-83b5-f453-c6485f540705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10202.1489451284@famine>
On 2017-03-13 8:28 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> I've got a bug report for someone using a Intel OPA devices in a bond, and
>> it appears these devices have a hardware address length of 20, opposed to
>> the typical 6 on ethernet. When they dump /proc/net/bonding/bondX, it only
>> prints the first 6 of the address, per %pM and mac_address_string(), while
>> sysfs for the interface does print the right thing, since it uses
>> sysfs_print_mac(), which takes a length argument.
>
> This (20 octet MAC length) is true for any Infiniband device.
>
>> So the question is... What's the best route to take here? Expand %pM to
>> support variable length hardware addresses? Use sysfs_* in procfs?
>> Reinvent the wheel? Nothing I've tinkered with just yet feels very clean,
>> on top of not actually working yet. :)
>
> sysfs_format_mac (not _print_mac) uses "%*phC", len, addr in its
> format string. Perhaps that format would be a better choice than %pM
> for this case?
Ah, I'd failed to fully grasp how %phC worked, had actually tried it w/o
the * in there, and only the first char of the addr was printing.
Working on an updated version that uses %*phC properly, which does look
like the way to go here. (Didn't help that I was also looking at an
older codebase that didn't have the sysfs_format_mac de-duplication).
I'll try to have a tested patch in flight tomorrow.
--
Jarod Wilson
jarod@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-14 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-13 23:45 bond procfs hw addr prints Jarod Wilson
2017-03-14 0:28 ` Jay Vosburgh
2017-03-14 2:06 ` Jarod Wilson [this message]
2017-03-14 3:26 ` Jarod Wilson
2017-03-30 17:57 ` Jarod Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8aa4aff4-e1b3-83b5-f453-c6485f540705@redhat.com \
--to=jarod@redhat.com \
--cc=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).