netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] virtio_net: build xdp_buff with multi buffers
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 17:10:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8aa5b8fb-d766-ac84-dfc1-4f9947e86e27@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e0cf3f23-a173-778b-fc68-27de811f1aab@redhat.com>



在 2022/12/27 下午2:46, Jason Wang 写道:
>
> 在 2022/12/20 22:14, Heng Qi 写道:
>> Support xdp for multi buffer packets in mergeable mode.
>>
>> Putting the first buffer as the linear part for xdp_buff,
>> and the rest of the buffers as non-linear fragments to struct
>> skb_shared_info in the tailroom belonging to xdp_buff.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> index 08f209d7b0bf..8fc3b1841d92 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -931,6 +931,84 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_big(struct 
>> net_device *dev,
>>       return NULL;
>>   }
>>   +/* TODO: build xdp in big mode */
>> +static int virtnet_build_xdp_buff_mrg(struct net_device *dev,
>> +                      struct virtnet_info *vi,
>> +                      struct receive_queue *rq,
>> +                      struct xdp_buff *xdp,
>> +                      void *buf,
>> +                      unsigned int len,
>> +                      unsigned int frame_sz,
>> +                      u16 *num_buf,
>> +                      unsigned int *xdp_frags_truesize,
>> +                      struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned int tailroom = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct 
>> skb_shared_info));
>> +    struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr = buf;
>> +    unsigned int truesize, headroom;
>> +    struct skb_shared_info *shinfo;
>> +    unsigned int xdp_frags_truesz = 0;
>> +    unsigned int cur_frag_size;
>> +    struct page *page;
>> +    skb_frag_t *frag;
>> +    int offset;
>> +    void *ctx;
>> +
>> +    xdp_init_buff(xdp, frame_sz, &rq->xdp_rxq);
>> +    xdp_prepare_buff(xdp, buf - VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM,
>> +             VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM + vi->hdr_len, len - vi->hdr_len, 
>> true);
>> +
>> +    if (*num_buf > 1) {
>> +        shinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(xdp);
>> +        shinfo->nr_frags = 0;
>> +        shinfo->xdp_frags_size = 0;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if ((*num_buf - 1) > MAX_SKB_FRAGS)
>> +        return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    while ((--*num_buf) >= 1) {
>> +        buf = virtqueue_get_buf_ctx(rq->vq, &len, &ctx);
>> +        if (unlikely(!buf)) {
>> +            pr_debug("%s: rx error: %d buffers out of %d missing\n",
>> +                 dev->name, *num_buf,
>> +                 virtio16_to_cpu(vi->vdev, hdr->num_buffers));
>> +            dev->stats.rx_length_errors++;
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        if (!xdp_buff_has_frags(xdp))
>> +            xdp_buff_set_frags_flag(xdp);
>
>
> Any reason to put this inside the loop?

I'll move it outside the loop in the next version.

>
>
>> +
>> +        stats->bytes += len;
>> +        page = virt_to_head_page(buf);
>> +        offset = buf - page_address(page);
>> +        truesize = mergeable_ctx_to_truesize(ctx);
>> +        headroom = mergeable_ctx_to_headroom(ctx);
>> +
>> +        cur_frag_size = truesize + (headroom ? (headroom + tailroom) 
>> : 0);
>> +        xdp_frags_truesz += cur_frag_size;
>
>
> Not related to this patch, but it would easily confuse the future 
> readers that the we need another math for truesize. I think at least 
> we need some comments for this or

Yes it might, I'll add more comments on this.

>
> I guess the root cause is in get_mergeable_buf_len:
>
> static unsigned int get_mergeable_buf_len(struct receive_queue *rq,
>                                       struct ewma_pkt_len *avg_pkt_len,
>                                           unsigned int room)
> {
>         struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
>         const size_t hdr_len = vi->hdr_len;
>         unsigned int len;
>
>         if (room)
>         return PAGE_SIZE - room;
>
> And we do
>
>     len = get_mergeable_buf_len(rq, &rq->mrg_avg_pkt_len, room);
>
>     ...
>
>     ctx = mergeable_len_to_ctx(len, headroom);
>
>
> I wonder if it's better to pack the real truesize (PAGE_SIZE) here. 
> This may ease a lot of things.

I don't know the historical reason for not packing, but I guess this is 
for the convenience of
comparing the actual length len given by the device with truesize. 
Therefore, I think it would
be better to keep the above practice for now? Perhaps, I can add more 
explanation to the
above code to help future readers try not to get confused.

Thanks.

>
> Thanks
>
>
>> +        if (unlikely(len > truesize || cur_frag_size > PAGE_SIZE)) {
>> +            pr_debug("%s: rx error: len %u exceeds truesize %lu\n",
>> +                 dev->name, len, (unsigned long)ctx);
>> +            dev->stats.rx_length_errors++;
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        frag = &shinfo->frags[shinfo->nr_frags++];
>> +        __skb_frag_set_page(frag, page);
>> +        skb_frag_off_set(frag, offset);
>> +        skb_frag_size_set(frag, len);
>> +        if (page_is_pfmemalloc(page))
>> +            xdp_buff_set_frag_pfmemalloc(xdp);
>> +
>> +        shinfo->xdp_frags_size += len;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    *xdp_frags_truesize = xdp_frags_truesz;
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct net_device *dev,
>>                        struct virtnet_info *vi,
>>                        struct receive_queue *rq,


  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-27  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-20 14:14 [PATCH v2 0/9] virtio_net: support multi buffer xdp Heng Qi
2022-12-20 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] virtio_net: disable the hole mechanism for xdp Heng Qi
2022-12-27  6:30   ` Jason Wang
2022-12-27  7:32     ` Heng Qi
2022-12-28  6:28       ` Jason Wang
2022-12-28  8:24         ` Heng Qi
2022-12-20 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] virtio_net: set up xdp for multi buffer packets Heng Qi
2022-12-27  6:32   ` Jason Wang
2022-12-27 12:20     ` Heng Qi
2022-12-28  3:50       ` Heng Qi
2022-12-28  6:27         ` Jason Wang
2022-12-20 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] virtio_net: update bytes calculation for xdp_frame Heng Qi
2022-12-20 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] virtio_net: build xdp_buff with multi buffers Heng Qi
2022-12-27  6:46   ` Jason Wang
2022-12-27  9:10     ` Heng Qi [this message]
2022-12-28  6:27       ` Jason Wang
2022-12-28  8:17         ` Heng Qi
2022-12-20 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] virtio_net: construct multi-buffer xdp in mergeable Heng Qi
2022-12-27  7:01   ` Jason Wang
2022-12-27  9:31     ` Heng Qi
2022-12-28  6:24       ` Jason Wang
2022-12-28  8:23         ` Heng Qi
2022-12-28 11:54           ` Jason Wang
2022-12-20 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] virtio_net: transmit the multi-buffer xdp Heng Qi
2022-12-27  7:12   ` Jason Wang
2022-12-27  8:26     ` Heng Qi
2022-12-28  6:30       ` Jason Wang
2022-12-28  8:25         ` Heng Qi
2022-12-20 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] virtio_net: build skb from " Heng Qi
2022-12-27  7:31   ` Jason Wang
2022-12-27  7:51     ` Heng Qi
2022-12-20 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] virtio_net: remove xdp related info from page_to_skb() Heng Qi
2022-12-27  7:55   ` Jason Wang
2022-12-27  8:27     ` Heng Qi
2022-12-20 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] virtio_net: support multi-buffer xdp Heng Qi
2022-12-27  9:03   ` Jason Wang
2022-12-27  9:11     ` Heng Qi
2022-12-22  1:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] virtio_net: support multi buffer xdp Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-22  2:04   ` Heng Qi
2022-12-26  2:32 ` Heng Qi
2022-12-26  4:14   ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8aa5b8fb-d766-ac84-dfc1-4f9947e86e27@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=hengqi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).