From: Nimrod Oren <noren@nvidia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [TEST] CX7 timeouts on reconfig w/ page pool failure injection
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 19:57:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8aa8c49b-736c-42b3-92d3-26bdfeb90a22@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260811080433.26f404dd@kernel.org>
On 11/08/2026 18:04, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:20:52 +0300 Nimrod Oren wrote:
>> On 04/08/2026 19:45, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> The CX7 testing in NIPA is looking pretty good, one major source of
>>> noise, tho, is that the pp-alloc test sometimes locks rtnl for
>>> a minute.
>>>
>>> Here's a failure in that test itself:
>>>
>>> # # Exception| subprocess.TimeoutExpired: Command '['ethtool', '-G', 'ens25f1np1', 'rx', '2048']' timed out after 20 seconds
>>> # # Exception|
>>> # not ok 1 pp_alloc_fail.test_pp_alloc
>>>
>>> https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/logview.html?f=/logs/hwksft/CX7-dbg/results/763842/test-outputs/36-pp-alloc-fail-py/stdout
>>>
>>> Then the next test that runs also times out during setup:
>>>
>>> # subprocess.TimeoutExpired: Command '['ip', '--json', '-d', 'link', 'show', 'dev', 'ens25f1np1']' timed out after 20 seconds
>>> not ok 1 selftests: drivers/net/hw: rss_api.py # exit=1
>>>
>>> https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/logs/hwksft/CX7-dbg/results/763842/test-outputs/37-rss-api-py/stdout
>>>
>>> pp_alloc test can fail, but spilling into the next test is a problem.
>>>
>>
>> Seems like the bigger culprit is the earlier xdp test, which leaves MTU
>> at 9000:
>>
>> # # Defer Exception| net.lib.py.utils.CmdExitFailure: Command failed
>> # # Defer Exception| CMD: ip link set dev ens25f1np1 mtu 1500 xdpdrv off
>> # # Defer Exception| EXIT: -15
>> # # Defer Exception|
>> # not ok 17 xdp.test_xdp_native_adjst_head_grow_data.ipv4
>> # # Totals: pass:14 fail:3 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>> not ok 1 selftests: drivers/net: xdp.py # TIMEOUT 360 seconds
>>
>> https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/logview.html?f=/logs/hwksft/CX7-dbg/results/763842/test-outputs/13-xdp-py/stdout
>
> Ah, well spotted. That's the test timeout, I'll bump the timeout from
> the current 6min to 10min. Once it passes we'll know the true time
> needed, and we shall set the timeout to 150% of the expected case..
>
Sounds good, thanks.
>> I'll try to reproduce this internally and investigate what happened.
>>
>> Also, I noticed that the pp-alloc test isn't properly restoring the rx
>> ring size due to the timeout. In the subsequent retry, it's attempting
>> to double it again, this time from 2K to 4K:
>>
>> # # Exception| subprocess.TimeoutExpired: Command '['ethtool', '-G',
>> 'ens25f1np1', 'rx', '4096']' timed out after 20 seconds
>> # # Exception|
>> # not ok 1 pp_alloc_fail.test_pp_alloc
>>
>> https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/logs/hwksft/CX7-dbg/results/763842/test-outputs/36-pp-alloc-fail-py-retry/stdout
>>
>> The high MTU and ring size along with the heavy debug kernel likely make
>> the pp-alloc test significantly slower. I'll also prepare a patch to fix
>> this pp-alloc cleanup issue.
>
> To be clear - if the commands time out - how can we fix the cleanup?
> Or do you mean some other bug?
In the pp-alloc test, the ring size command timed out, but the change
was still applied in the end.
Currently that test only attempts to restore the original ring size if
the set command returns successfully. This case makes me think that it
should attempt the restoration regardless...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-11 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 16:45 [TEST] CX7 timeouts on reconfig w/ page pool failure injection Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-04 17:16 ` Dragos Tatulea
2026-08-04 19:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-11 7:20 ` Nimrod Oren
2026-08-11 15:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-11 16:57 ` Nimrod Oren [this message]
2026-08-11 17:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8aa8c49b-736c-42b3-92d3-26bdfeb90a22@nvidia.com \
--to=noren@nvidia.com \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox