From: Paul Blakey <paulb@mellanox.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
Oz Shlomo <ozsh@mellanox.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>, Roi Dayan <roid@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net/sched: act_ct: Create nf flow table per zone
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 14:53:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8abe56cd-511b-50ad-b3a0-c802203d327b@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d173492-0b70-4318-6ddf-cc4dd015f217@mellanox.com>
On 3/1/2020 6:11 PM, Paul Blakey wrote:
> On 3/1/2020 5:47 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 01:58:41PM CET, paulb@mellanox.com wrote:
>>> Use the NF flow tables infrastructure for CT offload.
>>>
>>> Create a nf flow table per zone.
>>>
>>> Next patches will add FT entries to this table, and do
>>> the software offload.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Blakey <paulb@mellanox.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changelog:
>>> v1->v2:
>>> Use spin_lock_bh instead of spin_lock, and unlock for alloc (as it can sleep)
>>> Free ft on last tc act instance instead of last instance + last offloaded tuple,
>>> this removes cleanup cb and netfilter patches, and is simpler
>>> Removed accidental mlx5/core/en_tc.c change
>>> Removed reviewed by Jiri - patch changed
>>>
>>> include/net/tc_act/tc_ct.h | 2 +
>>> net/sched/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>> net/sched/act_ct.c | 143 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> 3 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/net/tc_act/tc_ct.h b/include/net/tc_act/tc_ct.h
>>> index a8b1564..cf3492e 100644
>>> --- a/include/net/tc_act/tc_ct.h
>>> +++ b/include/net/tc_act/tc_ct.h
>>> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ struct tcf_ct_params {
>>> u16 ct_action;
>>>
>>> struct rcu_head rcu;
>>> +
>>> + struct tcf_ct_flow_table *ct_ft;
>>> };
>>>
>>> struct tcf_ct {
>>> diff --git a/net/sched/Kconfig b/net/sched/Kconfig
>>> index edde0e5..bfbefb7 100644
>>> --- a/net/sched/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/net/sched/Kconfig
>>> @@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ config NET_ACT_TUNNEL_KEY
>>>
>>> config NET_ACT_CT
>>> tristate "connection tracking tc action"
>>> - depends on NET_CLS_ACT && NF_CONNTRACK && NF_NAT
>>> + depends on NET_CLS_ACT && NF_CONNTRACK && NF_NAT && NF_FLOW_TABLE
>>> help
>>> Say Y here to allow sending the packets to conntrack module.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
>>> index f685c0d..43dfdd1 100644
>>> --- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
>>> +++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
>>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/pkt_cls.h>
>>> #include <linux/ip.h>
>>> #include <linux/ipv6.h>
>>> +#include <linux/rhashtable.h>
>>> #include <net/netlink.h>
>>> #include <net/pkt_sched.h>
>>> #include <net/pkt_cls.h>
>>> @@ -24,6 +25,7 @@
>>> #include <uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_ct.h>
>>> #include <net/tc_act/tc_ct.h>
>>>
>>> +#include <net/netfilter/nf_flow_table.h>
>>> #include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h>
>>> #include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h>
>>> #include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_zones.h>
>>> @@ -31,6 +33,117 @@
>>> #include <net/netfilter/ipv6/nf_defrag_ipv6.h>
>>> #include <uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_nat.h>
>>>
>>> +static struct workqueue_struct *act_ct_wq;
>>> +static struct rhashtable zones_ht;
>>> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(zones_lock);
>>> +
>>> +struct tcf_ct_flow_table {
>>> + struct rhash_head node; /* In zones tables */
>>> +
>>> + struct rcu_work rwork;
>>> + struct nf_flowtable nf_ft;
>>> + u16 zone;
>>> + u32 ref;
>>> +
>>> + bool dying;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct rhashtable_params zones_params = {
>>> + .head_offset = offsetof(struct tcf_ct_flow_table, node),
>>> + .key_offset = offsetof(struct tcf_ct_flow_table, zone),
>>> + .key_len = sizeof_field(struct tcf_ct_flow_table, zone),
>>> + .automatic_shrinking = true,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct nf_flowtable_type flowtable_ct = {
>>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static int tcf_ct_flow_table_get(struct tcf_ct_params *params)
>>> +{
>>> + struct tcf_ct_flow_table *ct_ft, *new_ct_ft;
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + spin_lock_bh(&zones_lock);
>>> + ct_ft = rhashtable_lookup_fast(&zones_ht, ¶ms->zone, zones_params);
>>> + if (ct_ft)
>>> + goto take_ref;
>>> +
>>> + spin_unlock_bh(&zones_lock);
>>> + new_ct_ft = kzalloc(sizeof(*new_ct_ft), GFP_KERNEL);
>> Don't unlock-lock and just use GFP_ATOMIC.
> Sure will do.
Sent v3.
>>
>>> + if (!new_ct_ft)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + new_ct_ft->zone = params->zone;
>>> + spin_lock_bh(&zones_lock);
>>> + ct_ft = rhashtable_lookup_get_insert_fast(&zones_ht, &new_ct_ft->node,
>>> + zones_params);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(ct_ft)) {
>>> + err = PTR_ERR(ct_ft);
>>> + goto err_insert;
>>> + } else if (ct_ft) {
>>> + /* Already exists */
>>> + kfree(new_ct_ft);
>>> + goto take_ref;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + ct_ft = new_ct_ft;
>>> + ct_ft->nf_ft.type = &flowtable_ct;
>>> + err = nf_flow_table_init(&ct_ft->nf_ft);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + goto err_init;
>>> +
>>> + __module_get(THIS_MODULE);
>>> +take_ref:
>>> + params->ct_ft = ct_ft;
>>> + ct_ft->ref++;
>>> + spin_unlock_bh(&zones_lock);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> +err_init:
>>> + rhashtable_remove_fast(&zones_ht, &new_ct_ft->node, zones_params);
>>> +err_insert:
>>> + spin_unlock_bh(&zones_lock);
>>> + kfree(new_ct_ft);
>>> + return err;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>> +{
>>> + struct tcf_ct_flow_table *ct_ft;
>>> +
>>> + ct_ft = container_of(to_rcu_work(work), struct tcf_ct_flow_table,
>>> + rwork);
>>> + nf_flow_table_free(&ct_ft->nf_ft);
>>> + kfree(ct_ft);
>>> +
>>> + module_put(THIS_MODULE);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void tcf_ct_flow_table_put(struct tcf_ct_params *params)
>>> +{
>>> + struct tcf_ct_flow_table *ct_ft = params->ct_ft;
>>> +
>>> + spin_lock_bh(&zones_lock);
>>> + if (--params->ct_ft->ref == 0) {
>>> + rhashtable_remove_fast(&zones_ht, &ct_ft->node, zones_params);
>>> + INIT_RCU_WORK(&ct_ft->rwork, tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work);
>>> + queue_rcu_work(act_ct_wq, &ct_ft->rwork);
>>> + }
>>> + spin_unlock_bh(&zones_lock);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int tcf_ct_flow_tables_init(void)
>>> +{
>>> + return rhashtable_init(&zones_ht, &zones_params);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void tcf_ct_flow_tables_uninit(void)
>>> +{
>>> + rhashtable_destroy(&zones_ht);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static struct tc_action_ops act_ct_ops;
>>> static unsigned int ct_net_id;
>>>
>>> @@ -207,6 +320,8 @@ static void tcf_ct_params_free(struct rcu_head *head)
>>> struct tcf_ct_params *params = container_of(head,
>>> struct tcf_ct_params, rcu);
>>>
>>> + tcf_ct_flow_table_put(params);
>>> +
>>> if (params->tmpl)
>>> nf_conntrack_put(¶ms->tmpl->ct_general);
>>> kfree(params);
>>> @@ -730,6 +845,10 @@ static int tcf_ct_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
>>> if (err)
>>> goto cleanup;
>>>
>>> + err = tcf_ct_flow_table_get(params);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + goto cleanup;
>>> +
>>> spin_lock_bh(&c->tcf_lock);
>>> goto_ch = tcf_action_set_ctrlact(*a, parm->action, goto_ch);
>>> params = rcu_replace_pointer(c->params, params,
>>> @@ -974,12 +1093,34 @@ static void __net_exit ct_exit_net(struct list_head *net_list)
>>>
>>> static int __init ct_init_module(void)
>>> {
>>> - return tcf_register_action(&act_ct_ops, &ct_net_ops);
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + act_ct_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("act_ct_workqueue", 0);
>>> + if (!act_ct_wq)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + err = tcf_ct_flow_tables_init();
>>> + if (err)
>>> + goto err_tbl_init;
>>> +
>>> + err = tcf_register_action(&act_ct_ops, &ct_net_ops);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + goto err_register;
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> +err_tbl_init:
>>> + destroy_workqueue(act_ct_wq);
>>> +err_register:
>>> + tcf_ct_flow_tables_uninit();
>>> + return err;
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void __exit ct_cleanup_module(void)
>>> {
>>> tcf_unregister_action(&act_ct_ops, &ct_net_ops);
>>> + tcf_ct_flow_tables_uninit();
>>> + destroy_workqueue(act_ct_wq);
>>> }
>>>
>>> module_init(ct_init_module);
>>> --
>>> 1.8.3.1
>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-03 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-01 12:58 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] act_ct: Software offload of conntrack_in Paul Blakey
2020-03-01 12:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net/sched: act_ct: Create nf flow table per zone Paul Blakey
2020-03-01 15:47 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-03-01 16:11 ` Paul Blakey
2020-03-03 12:53 ` Paul Blakey [this message]
2020-03-01 12:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net/sched: act_ct: Offload established connections to flow table Paul Blakey
2020-03-01 12:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net/sched: act_ct: Software offload of established flows Paul Blakey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8abe56cd-511b-50ad-b3a0-c802203d327b@mellanox.com \
--to=paulb@mellanox.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ozsh@mellanox.com \
--cc=roid@mellanox.com \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
--cc=vladbu@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox