Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Blakey <paulb@mellanox.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
	Oz Shlomo <ozsh@mellanox.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
	Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>, Roi Dayan <roid@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net/sched: act_ct: Create nf flow table per zone
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 14:53:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8abe56cd-511b-50ad-b3a0-c802203d327b@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d173492-0b70-4318-6ddf-cc4dd015f217@mellanox.com>


On 3/1/2020 6:11 PM, Paul Blakey wrote:
> On 3/1/2020 5:47 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 01:58:41PM CET, paulb@mellanox.com wrote:
>>> Use the NF flow tables infrastructure for CT offload.
>>>
>>> Create a nf flow table per zone.
>>>
>>> Next patches will add FT entries to this table, and do
>>> the software offload.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Blakey <paulb@mellanox.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changelog:
>>>  v1->v2:
>>>    Use spin_lock_bh instead of spin_lock, and unlock for alloc (as it can sleep)
>>>    Free ft on last tc act instance instead of last instance + last offloaded tuple,
>>>    this removes cleanup cb and netfilter patches, and is simpler
>>>    Removed accidental mlx5/core/en_tc.c change
>>>    Removed reviewed by Jiri - patch changed
>>>
>>> include/net/tc_act/tc_ct.h |   2 +
>>> net/sched/Kconfig          |   2 +-
>>> net/sched/act_ct.c         | 143 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> 3 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/net/tc_act/tc_ct.h b/include/net/tc_act/tc_ct.h
>>> index a8b1564..cf3492e 100644
>>> --- a/include/net/tc_act/tc_ct.h
>>> +++ b/include/net/tc_act/tc_ct.h
>>> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ struct tcf_ct_params {
>>> 	u16 ct_action;
>>>
>>> 	struct rcu_head rcu;
>>> +
>>> +	struct tcf_ct_flow_table *ct_ft;
>>> };
>>>
>>> struct tcf_ct {
>>> diff --git a/net/sched/Kconfig b/net/sched/Kconfig
>>> index edde0e5..bfbefb7 100644
>>> --- a/net/sched/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/net/sched/Kconfig
>>> @@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ config NET_ACT_TUNNEL_KEY
>>>
>>> config NET_ACT_CT
>>> 	tristate "connection tracking tc action"
>>> -	depends on NET_CLS_ACT && NF_CONNTRACK && NF_NAT
>>> +	depends on NET_CLS_ACT && NF_CONNTRACK && NF_NAT && NF_FLOW_TABLE
>>> 	help
>>> 	  Say Y here to allow sending the packets to conntrack module.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
>>> index f685c0d..43dfdd1 100644
>>> --- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
>>> +++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
>>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/pkt_cls.h>
>>> #include <linux/ip.h>
>>> #include <linux/ipv6.h>
>>> +#include <linux/rhashtable.h>
>>> #include <net/netlink.h>
>>> #include <net/pkt_sched.h>
>>> #include <net/pkt_cls.h>
>>> @@ -24,6 +25,7 @@
>>> #include <uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_ct.h>
>>> #include <net/tc_act/tc_ct.h>
>>>
>>> +#include <net/netfilter/nf_flow_table.h>
>>> #include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h>
>>> #include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h>
>>> #include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_zones.h>
>>> @@ -31,6 +33,117 @@
>>> #include <net/netfilter/ipv6/nf_defrag_ipv6.h>
>>> #include <uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_nat.h>
>>>
>>> +static struct workqueue_struct *act_ct_wq;
>>> +static struct rhashtable zones_ht;
>>> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(zones_lock);
>>> +
>>> +struct tcf_ct_flow_table {
>>> +	struct rhash_head node; /* In zones tables */
>>> +
>>> +	struct rcu_work rwork;
>>> +	struct nf_flowtable nf_ft;
>>> +	u16 zone;
>>> +	u32 ref;
>>> +
>>> +	bool dying;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct rhashtable_params zones_params = {
>>> +	.head_offset = offsetof(struct tcf_ct_flow_table, node),
>>> +	.key_offset = offsetof(struct tcf_ct_flow_table, zone),
>>> +	.key_len = sizeof_field(struct tcf_ct_flow_table, zone),
>>> +	.automatic_shrinking = true,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct nf_flowtable_type flowtable_ct = {
>>> +	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static int tcf_ct_flow_table_get(struct tcf_ct_params *params)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct tcf_ct_flow_table *ct_ft, *new_ct_ft;
>>> +	int err;
>>> +
>>> +	spin_lock_bh(&zones_lock);
>>> +	ct_ft = rhashtable_lookup_fast(&zones_ht, &params->zone, zones_params);
>>> +	if (ct_ft)
>>> +		goto take_ref;
>>> +
>>> +	spin_unlock_bh(&zones_lock);
>>> +	new_ct_ft = kzalloc(sizeof(*new_ct_ft), GFP_KERNEL);
>> Don't unlock-lock and just use GFP_ATOMIC.
> Sure will do.
Sent v3.
>>
>>> +	if (!new_ct_ft)
>>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> +	new_ct_ft->zone = params->zone;
>>> +	spin_lock_bh(&zones_lock);
>>> +	ct_ft = rhashtable_lookup_get_insert_fast(&zones_ht, &new_ct_ft->node,
>>> +						  zones_params);
>>> +	if (IS_ERR(ct_ft)) {
>>> +		err = PTR_ERR(ct_ft);
>>> +		goto err_insert;
>>> +	} else if (ct_ft) {
>>> +		/* Already exists */
>>> +		kfree(new_ct_ft);
>>> +		goto take_ref;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	ct_ft = new_ct_ft;
>>> +	ct_ft->nf_ft.type = &flowtable_ct;
>>> +	err = nf_flow_table_init(&ct_ft->nf_ft);
>>> +	if (err)
>>> +		goto err_init;
>>> +
>>> +	__module_get(THIS_MODULE);
>>> +take_ref:
>>> +	params->ct_ft = ct_ft;
>>> +	ct_ft->ref++;
>>> +	spin_unlock_bh(&zones_lock);
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +
>>> +err_init:
>>> +	rhashtable_remove_fast(&zones_ht, &new_ct_ft->node, zones_params);
>>> +err_insert:
>>> +	spin_unlock_bh(&zones_lock);
>>> +	kfree(new_ct_ft);
>>> +	return err;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct tcf_ct_flow_table *ct_ft;
>>> +
>>> +	ct_ft = container_of(to_rcu_work(work), struct tcf_ct_flow_table,
>>> +			     rwork);
>>> +	nf_flow_table_free(&ct_ft->nf_ft);
>>> +	kfree(ct_ft);
>>> +
>>> +	module_put(THIS_MODULE);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void tcf_ct_flow_table_put(struct tcf_ct_params *params)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct tcf_ct_flow_table *ct_ft = params->ct_ft;
>>> +
>>> +	spin_lock_bh(&zones_lock);
>>> +	if (--params->ct_ft->ref == 0) {
>>> +		rhashtable_remove_fast(&zones_ht, &ct_ft->node, zones_params);
>>> +		INIT_RCU_WORK(&ct_ft->rwork, tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work);
>>> +		queue_rcu_work(act_ct_wq, &ct_ft->rwork);
>>> +	}
>>> +	spin_unlock_bh(&zones_lock);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int tcf_ct_flow_tables_init(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	return rhashtable_init(&zones_ht, &zones_params);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void tcf_ct_flow_tables_uninit(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	rhashtable_destroy(&zones_ht);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static struct tc_action_ops act_ct_ops;
>>> static unsigned int ct_net_id;
>>>
>>> @@ -207,6 +320,8 @@ static void tcf_ct_params_free(struct rcu_head *head)
>>> 	struct tcf_ct_params *params = container_of(head,
>>> 						    struct tcf_ct_params, rcu);
>>>
>>> +	tcf_ct_flow_table_put(params);
>>> +
>>> 	if (params->tmpl)
>>> 		nf_conntrack_put(&params->tmpl->ct_general);
>>> 	kfree(params);
>>> @@ -730,6 +845,10 @@ static int tcf_ct_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
>>> 	if (err)
>>> 		goto cleanup;
>>>
>>> +	err = tcf_ct_flow_table_get(params);
>>> +	if (err)
>>> +		goto cleanup;
>>> +
>>> 	spin_lock_bh(&c->tcf_lock);
>>> 	goto_ch = tcf_action_set_ctrlact(*a, parm->action, goto_ch);
>>> 	params = rcu_replace_pointer(c->params, params,
>>> @@ -974,12 +1093,34 @@ static void __net_exit ct_exit_net(struct list_head *net_list)
>>>
>>> static int __init ct_init_module(void)
>>> {
>>> -	return tcf_register_action(&act_ct_ops, &ct_net_ops);
>>> +	int err;
>>> +
>>> +	act_ct_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("act_ct_workqueue", 0);
>>> +	if (!act_ct_wq)
>>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> +	err = tcf_ct_flow_tables_init();
>>> +	if (err)
>>> +		goto err_tbl_init;
>>> +
>>> +	err = tcf_register_action(&act_ct_ops, &ct_net_ops);
>>> +	if (err)
>>> +		goto err_register;
>>> +
>>> +	return 0;
>>> +
>>> +err_tbl_init:
>>> +	destroy_workqueue(act_ct_wq);
>>> +err_register:
>>> +	tcf_ct_flow_tables_uninit();
>>> +	return err;
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void __exit ct_cleanup_module(void)
>>> {
>>> 	tcf_unregister_action(&act_ct_ops, &ct_net_ops);
>>> +	tcf_ct_flow_tables_uninit();
>>> +	destroy_workqueue(act_ct_wq);
>>> }
>>>
>>> module_init(ct_init_module);
>>> -- 
>>> 1.8.3.1
>>>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-03 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-01 12:58 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] act_ct: Software offload of conntrack_in Paul Blakey
2020-03-01 12:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net/sched: act_ct: Create nf flow table per zone Paul Blakey
2020-03-01 15:47   ` Jiri Pirko
2020-03-01 16:11     ` Paul Blakey
2020-03-03 12:53       ` Paul Blakey [this message]
2020-03-01 12:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net/sched: act_ct: Offload established connections to flow table Paul Blakey
2020-03-01 12:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net/sched: act_ct: Software offload of established flows Paul Blakey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8abe56cd-511b-50ad-b3a0-c802203d327b@mellanox.com \
    --to=paulb@mellanox.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ozsh@mellanox.com \
    --cc=roid@mellanox.com \
    --cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
    --cc=vladbu@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox