From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
To: Jinghao Jia <jinghao7@illinois.edu>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, Ruowen Qin <ruqin@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net] ipvs: fix UB due to uninitialized stack access in ip_vs_protocol_init()
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 19:59:19 +0200 (EET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b210ce9-19d8-eefd-fc86-febdc33394f6@ssi.bg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241123094256.28887-1-jinghao7@illinois.edu>
Hello,
On Sat, 23 Nov 2024, Jinghao Jia wrote:
> Under certain kernel configurations when building with Clang/LLVM, the
> compiler does not generate a return or jump as the terminator
> instruction for ip_vs_protocol_init(), triggering the following objtool
> warning during build time:
>
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: ip_vs_protocol_init() falls through to next function __initstub__kmod_ip_vs_rr__935_123_ip_vs_rr_init6()
>
> At runtime, this either causes an oops when trying to load the ipvs
> module or a boot-time panic if ipvs is built-in. This same issue has
> been reported by the Intel kernel test robot previously.
>
> Digging deeper into both LLVM and the kernel code reveals this to be a
> undefined behavior problem. ip_vs_protocol_init() uses a on-stack buffer
> of 64 chars to store the registered protocol names and leaves it
> uninitialized after definition. The function calls strnlen() when
> concatenating protocol names into the buffer. With CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE
> strnlen() performs an extra step to check whether the last byte of the
> input char buffer is a null character (commit 3009f891bb9f ("fortify:
> Allow strlen() and strnlen() to pass compile-time known lengths")).
> This, together with possibly other configurations, cause the following
> IR to be generated:
>
> define hidden i32 @ip_vs_protocol_init() local_unnamed_addr #5 section ".init.text" align 16 !kcfi_type !29 {
> %1 = alloca [64 x i8], align 16
> ...
>
> 14: ; preds = %11
> %15 = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %1, i64 63
> %16 = load i8, ptr %15, align 1
> %17 = tail call i1 @llvm.is.constant.i8(i8 %16)
> %18 = icmp eq i8 %16, 0
> %19 = select i1 %17, i1 %18, i1 false
> br i1 %19, label %20, label %23
>
> 20: ; preds = %14
> %21 = call i64 @strlen(ptr noundef nonnull dereferenceable(1) %1) #23
> ...
>
> 23: ; preds = %14, %11, %20
> %24 = call i64 @strnlen(ptr noundef nonnull dereferenceable(1) %1, i64 noundef 64) #24
> ...
> }
>
> The above code calculates the address of the last char in the buffer
> (value %15) and then loads from it (value %16). Because the buffer is
> never initialized, the LLVM GVN pass marks value %16 as undefined:
>
> %13 = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %1, i64 63
> br i1 undef, label %14, label %17
>
> This gives later passes (SCCP, in particular) more DCE opportunities by
> propagating the undef value further, and eventually removes everything
> after the load on the uninitialized stack location:
>
> define hidden i32 @ip_vs_protocol_init() local_unnamed_addr #0 section ".init.text" align 16 !kcfi_type !11 {
> %1 = alloca [64 x i8], align 16
> ...
>
> 12: ; preds = %11
> %13 = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %1, i64 63
> unreachable
> }
>
> In this way, the generated native code will just fall through to the
> next function, as LLVM does not generate any code for the unreachable IR
> instruction and leaves the function without a terminator.
>
> Zero the on-stack buffer to avoid this possible UB.
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202402100205.PWXIz1ZK-lkp@intel.com/
> Co-developed-by: Ruowen Qin <ruqin@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ruowen Qin <ruqin@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jinghao Jia <jinghao7@illinois.edu>
Looks good to me, thanks!
Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v2 -> v3:
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241122045257.27452-1-jinghao7@illinois.edu/
> * Fix changelog format based on Julian's feedback
>
> v1 -> v2:
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241111065105.82431-1-jinghao7@illinois.edu/
> * Fix small error in commit message
> * Address Julian's feedback:
> * Make this patch target the net tree rather than net-next
> * Add a "Fixes" tag for the initial git commit
>
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c
> index f100da4ba3bc..a9fd1d3fc2cb 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto.c
> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ void __net_exit ip_vs_protocol_net_cleanup(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
>
> int __init ip_vs_protocol_init(void)
> {
> - char protocols[64];
> + char protocols[64] = { 0 };
> #define REGISTER_PROTOCOL(p) \
> do { \
> register_ip_vs_protocol(p); \
> @@ -348,8 +348,6 @@ int __init ip_vs_protocol_init(void)
> strcat(protocols, (p)->name); \
> } while (0)
>
> - protocols[0] = '\0';
> - protocols[2] = '\0';
> #ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_PROTO_TCP
> REGISTER_PROTOCOL(&ip_vs_protocol_tcp);
> #endif
> --
> 2.47.0
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-25 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-23 9:42 [PATCH v3 net] ipvs: fix UB due to uninitialized stack access in ip_vs_protocol_init() Jinghao Jia
2024-11-25 17:59 ` Julian Anastasov [this message]
2024-11-28 8:18 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-11-28 11:18 ` Julian Anastasov
2024-11-28 12:12 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8b210ce9-19d8-eefd-fc86-febdc33394f6@ssi.bg \
--to=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=jinghao7@illinois.edu \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=ruqin@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox