Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/xe: switch xe_pagefault_queue_init() to using bitmap_weighted_or()

[<anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>]

On 3/28/26 2:57 PM, Yury Norov <ynorov@nvidia.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 02:40:53PM -0800, Tony Nguyen wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 3/4/2026 3:43 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> On Sun, Mar 01, 2026 at 08:11:58PM -0500, Yury Norov wrote:
> >>> The function calls bitmap_or() immediately followed by bitmap_weight().
> >>> Switch to using the dedicated bitmap_weighted_or() and save one bitmap
> >>> traverse.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@nvidia.com>
> >>
> >> It's not entirely clear to me why this patch is included in a patchset
> >> for the ice driver.
> >>
> >> And it's also not clear to me why, but allmodconfigs - fo4 at least x86_32
> >> and x86_64 - fail with this patch applied to net-next [1].
> >>
> >> ERROR: modpost: "__bitmap_weighted_or" [drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe.ko] undefined!
> >>
> >> [1] 2b12ffb66955 ("net: mana: Trigger VF reset/recovery on health check failure due to HWC timeout")
> >
> > I'm also seeing the same error and no apparent reason. Since this doesn't
> > seem dependent on the others, I'll take the other 3 and this can get
> > sent/resolved separately.
> 
> That's because the symbol is not exported, and the driver is build as
> module.
> 
> It's already fixed in -next: 95d324fb1b484 ("bitmap: add test_zero_nbits()").
> Let me know if you want me to send the fix as a separate patch in your
> tree. Or I can take this patch in my branch, if you give me your tags.

IIRC there weren't any dependencies on this patch with the others, so I don't
see a need for this to go via the Intel tree. I believe this can submitted by itself?

Thanks,
Tony

> Thanks,
> Yury
>