From: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@mellanox.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] devlink: Execute devlink health recover as a work
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 13:04:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8bb8a789-c189-df07-5d90-fd8f2fa172ca@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190425193737.131be39f@cakuba.netronome.com>
On 4/26/2019 5:37 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 01:42:34 +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>>>> @@ -4813,7 +4831,11 @@ static int
>>>> devlink_nl_cmd_health_reporter_recover_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>> if (!reporter)
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>
>>>> - return devlink_health_reporter_recover(reporter, NULL);
>>>> + if (!reporter->ops->recover)
>>>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>> +
>>>> + queue_work(devlink->reporters_wq, &reporter->recover_work);
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> }
>>>
>>> So the recover user space request will no longer return the status,
>>> and
>>> it will not actually wait for the recover to happen. Leaving user
>>> pondering - did the recover run and fail, or did it nor get run
>>> yet...
>>>
>>
>> wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout is missing from the design ?
>
> Perhaps, but I think its better to avoid the async execution of
> the recover all together. Perhaps its better to refcount the
> reporters on the call to recover_doit? Or some such.. :)
>
I tried using refcount instead of devlink lock here. But once I get to
reporter destroy I wait for the refcount and not sure if I should
release the reporter after some timeout or have endless wait for
refcount. Both options seem not good.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-26 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-25 10:57 [PATCH net-next] devlink: Execute devlink health recover as a work Moshe Shemesh
2019-04-25 18:11 ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-04-25 21:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-04-26 1:42 ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-04-26 2:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-04-26 13:04 ` Moshe Shemesh [this message]
2019-04-26 16:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-04-27 17:15 ` Moshe Shemesh
2019-04-26 4:38 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8bb8a789-c189-df07-5d90-fd8f2fa172ca@mellanox.com \
--to=moshe@mellanox.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox