From: Gregory Rose <gvrose8192@gmail.com>
To: xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com, pshelar@ovn.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/10] optimize openvswitch flow looking up
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 13:01:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c2d501a-f943-5ee1-e430-0c36d77a33b5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1570802447-8019-1-git-send-email-xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
On 10/11/2019 7:00 AM, xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
>
> This series patch optimize openvswitch for performance or simplify
> codes.
>
> Patch 1, 2, 4: Port Pravin B Shelar patches to
> linux upstream with little changes.
>
> Patch 5, 6, 7: Optimize the flow looking up and
> simplify the flow hash.
>
> Patch 8, 9: are bugfix.
>
> The performance test is on Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4.
> The test topology is show as below:
>
> +-----------------------------------+
> | +---------------------------+ |
> | | eth0 ovs-switch eth1 | | Host0
> | +---------------------------+ |
> +-----------------------------------+
> ^ |
> | |
> | |
> | |
> | v
> +-----+----+ +----+-----+
> | netperf | Host1 | netserver| Host2
> +----------+ +----------+
>
> We use netperf send the 64B packets, and insert 255+ flow-mask:
> $ ovs-dpctl add-flow ovs-switch "in_port(1),eth(dst=00:01:00:00:00:00/ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:01),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(frag=no)" 2
> ...
> $ ovs-dpctl add-flow ovs-switch "in_port(1),eth(dst=00:ff:00:00:00:00/ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(frag=no)" 2
> $
> $ netperf -t UDP_STREAM -H 2.2.2.200 -l 40 -- -m 18
>
> * Without series patch, throughput 8.28Mbps
> * With series patch, throughput 46.05Mbps
>
> v2: simplify codes. e.g. use kfree_rcu instead of call_rcu, use
> ma->count in the fastpath.
> v3: update ma point when realloc mask_array in patch 5.
>
> Tonghao Zhang (10):
> net: openvswitch: add flow-mask cache for performance
> net: openvswitch: convert mask list in mask array
> net: openvswitch: shrink the mask array if necessary
> net: openvswitch: optimize flow mask cache hash collision
> net: openvswitch: optimize flow-mask looking up
> net: openvswitch: simplify the flow_hash
> net: openvswitch: add likely in flow_lookup
> net: openvswitch: fix possible memleak on destroy flow-table
> net: openvswitch: don't unlock mutex when changing the user_features
> fails
> net: openvswitch: simplify the ovs_dp_cmd_new
>
> net/openvswitch/datapath.c | 65 +++++----
> net/openvswitch/flow.h | 1 -
> net/openvswitch/flow_table.c | 315 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> net/openvswitch/flow_table.h | 19 ++-
> 4 files changed, 328 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
>
Hi Tonghao,
I've tried this new patch series and it passes the kernel check test #63
now:
## ------------------------------- ##
## openvswitch 2.12.90 test suite. ##
## ------------------------------- ##
63: conntrack - IPv6 fragmentation + vlan ok
## ------------- ##
## Test results. ##
## ------------- ##
1 test was successful.
So I went ahead and ran the entire check-kernel testsuite and it ran
fine with no regressions or
other problems.
You can go ahead and add my tested by tag to your patches.
Tested-by: Greg Rose <gvrose8192@gmail.com>
Pravin's comments about the memory barrier are still valid I think.
Thanks,
- Greg
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-15 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-11 14:00 [PATCH net-next v3 00/10] optimize openvswitch flow looking up xiangxia.m.yue
2019-10-11 14:00 ` [PATCH net-next v3 01/10] net: openvswitch: add flow-mask cache for performance xiangxia.m.yue
2019-10-11 14:00 ` [PATCH net-next v3 02/10] net: openvswitch: convert mask list in mask array xiangxia.m.yue
2019-10-13 10:58 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-11 14:00 ` [PATCH net-next v3 03/10] net: openvswitch: shrink the mask array if necessary xiangxia.m.yue
2019-10-11 14:00 ` [PATCH net-next v3 04/10] net: openvswitch: optimize flow mask cache hash collision xiangxia.m.yue
2019-10-11 14:00 ` [PATCH net-next v3 05/10] net: openvswitch: optimize flow-mask looking up xiangxia.m.yue
2019-10-14 7:02 ` Pravin Shelar
2019-10-11 14:00 ` [PATCH net-next v3 06/10] net: openvswitch: simplify the flow_hash xiangxia.m.yue
2019-10-11 14:00 ` [PATCH net-next v3 07/10] net: openvswitch: add likely in flow_lookup xiangxia.m.yue
2019-10-11 14:00 ` [PATCH net-next v3 08/10] net: openvswitch: fix possible memleak on destroy flow-table xiangxia.m.yue
2019-10-11 14:00 ` [PATCH net-next v3 09/10] net: openvswitch: don't unlock mutex when changing the user_features fails xiangxia.m.yue
2019-10-11 14:00 ` [PATCH net-next v3 10/10] net: openvswitch: simplify the ovs_dp_cmd_new xiangxia.m.yue
2019-10-15 20:01 ` Gregory Rose [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8c2d501a-f943-5ee1-e430-0c36d77a33b5@gmail.com \
--to=gvrose8192@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
--cc=xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).