Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@dev.mellanox.co.il>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/mlx4_en: CHECKSUM_COMPLETE support for fragments
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2018 11:06:15 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c43b222-f736-412b-e87c-017610fc97df@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALzJLG-BEORd+YgBqk1E1PFd8fjzDkUDQGP29ApgMaQXTPJxqw@mail.gmail.com>



On 30/03/2018 3:34 AM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
>> Refine the RX check summing handling to propagate the
>> hardware provided checksum so that we do not have to
>> compute it later in software.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>> Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
>> Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c | 10 ++++------
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
>> index 05787efef492b1c0c6ce540ef73647fad91ce282..5c613c6663da51a4ae792eeb4d8956b54655786b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
>> @@ -821,14 +821,12 @@ int mlx4_en_process_rx_cq(struct net_device *dev, struct mlx4_en_cq *cq, int bud
>>                  skb_record_rx_queue(skb, cq_ring);
>>
>>                  if (likely(dev->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM)) {
>> -                       if (cqe->status & cpu_to_be16(MLX4_CQE_STATUS_TCP |
>> -                                                     MLX4_CQE_STATUS_UDP)) {
>> +                       if ((cqe->status & cpu_to_be16(MLX4_CQE_STATUS_TCP |
>> +                                                      MLX4_CQE_STATUS_UDP)) &&
>> +                           (cqe->status & cpu_to_be16(MLX4_CQE_STATUS_IPOK)) &&
>> +                           cqe->checksum == cpu_to_be16(0xffff)) {
>>                                  bool l2_tunnel;
>>
> 
> LGTM, this code even aligns better with the mlx4 HW documentation:
> 
> "When L4_CSUM field is not supported, L4 checksum for TCP/UDP packets
> can be validated by: (IP_OK && (TCP || UDP)) && (checksum ==
> 0xFFFF))."
> 

Hi,
Thanks Eric for your patch.
Thanks Saeed for your review while I'm off-work.

In IP fragments, MLX4_CQE_STATUS_IPOK is not set in cqe->status.
This patch suggests falling back to CHECKSUM_COMPLETE instead of 
CHECKSUM_NONE.
Looks good to me.

> in the code we don't even consider L4_CSUM at the moment, As a future
> patch, it could be a nice acceleration for the above 3 steps
> condition.
> 

Right. Good idea. I'll add it to plans.

> Small comment, if we expect that  cqe->checksum is NOT likely to be
> 0xffff for UDP/TCP packets, maybe it is better performance wise to
> move (cqe->checksum == cpu_to_be16(0xffff)) to be evaluated first in
> the condition.
> 

It _is_ likely  for common TCP/UDP (no IP fragments).
Let's keep it this way.

>> -                               if (!((cqe->status & cpu_to_be16(MLX4_CQE_STATUS_IPOK)) &&
>> -                                     cqe->checksum == cpu_to_be16(0xffff)))
>> -                                       goto csum_none;
>> -
>>                                  l2_tunnel = (dev->hw_enc_features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM) &&
>>                                          (cqe->vlan_my_qpn & cpu_to_be32(MLX4_CQE_L2_TUNNEL));
>>                                  ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
>> --
>> 2.17.0.rc1.321.gba9d0f2565-goog
>>

Acked-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-01  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-27 21:21 [PATCH net-next] net/mlx4_en: CHECKSUM_COMPLETE support for fragments Eric Dumazet
2018-03-29 18:07 ` David Miller
2018-03-30  0:44   ` Saeed Mahameed
2018-03-30  3:32     ` Eric Dumazet
2018-03-30  0:34 ` Saeed Mahameed
2018-04-01  8:06   ` Tariq Toukan [this message]
2018-04-01 16:39     ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-01 17:57       ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8c43b222-f736-412b-e87c-017610fc97df@mellanox.com \
    --to=tariqt@mellanox.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saeedm@dev.mellanox.co.il \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox