From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E99A3A7D63; Wed, 7 Oct 2026 19:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791401657; cv=none; b=Ru97rrkc1w9/+aSFMeHv4jX/SxD7wRnKDThrVNDepHe+VQCftrSCzCoy36IPAe4q1AeazdMx5dDWyZffWfIo9DCNqmGkcLE6NtzyTwovjOOeqnm+M2Jzd8ovf1O1IVri1v1v1zsVDq8FVJdrJ1mHYmVqgm1BS7wZVgjGmrrIyrA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791401657; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qBvTS/0nL5YnknhGfRSgaAg0US2PHMc2x7BdxCqV2cg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GZQQMYweSgI5UP9wleRAEqBvpDV3tjOJ3xq0fCvg6fcqsDl4Vv0NN49qtcZiQ/aCuYRBXjkW61ne1W0C8f308RRHzzvMCn9srG5K8cadj6wabX8c2ZmmkC1+Bt5E9M7LCZ5oz6EhZTreFRrwNrJiiwxSHNdw2BFGfrZwGICL3Zo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b=DbS60WIG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="DbS60WIG" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=2vM4MEwdHs570z1trHR1waD0+VoMhgMGlPDSlu4CvcM=; b=DbS60WIGzG3WiDfzoqQEcENQmb bevs6cpS5TOuX+NfNXHngSavpXHo+JHSjIC5Tg2lXeYBbOJFVPiAOYEcwm+RrI9OiiiqJBMQEniJQ gmKrEO+aAiHUzjTJUnemKPvkfQg4bIGRnUWs/eH0KcABlYn/H2FRBJ0FGl6mLY5JjSl8=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1xEXOt-009VZv-PH; Wed, 07 Oct 2026 21:34:03 +0200 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2026 21:34:03 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: James Hilliard Cc: Jakub Kicinski , netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni , Maxime Chevallier , Andrew Lunn , Eric Dumazet , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Serge Semin , "David S. Miller" , Nicolai Buchwitz , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: stmmac: unwind the WoL IRQ after a safety IRQ request failure Message-ID: <8cd651e5-d240-4663-8361-c3b939d664e9@lunn.ch> References: <179127056620.2231598.8882282421523696709@kernel.org> <20261006155214.63c5cb5b@kernel.org> <98a7f952-37cd-4886-acb2-e87743e51fba@lunn.ch> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: > Should I re-spin this on net-next with the fixes tag dropped? Or does > this apply as-is on net-next? You should respin. We get hundreds of patches a day. Maintainers have no time to see if is applies cleanly, compiles and passes basic smoke tests on hardware. Andrew