netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: "Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)" <quic_abchauha@quicinc.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
	kernel@quicinc.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] net: Re-use and set mono_delivery_time bit for userspace tstamp packets
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:48:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d245f5a-0c75-4634-9513-3d420eb2c88f@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e270b646-dae0-41cf-9ef8-e991738b9c57@quicinc.com>

On 3/14/24 1:53 PM, Abhishek Chauhan (ABC) wrote:
>>> The bpf_convert_tstamp_{read,write} and the helper bpf_skb_set_tstamp need to be
>>> changed to handle the new "user_delivery_time" bit anyway, e.g.
>>> bpf_skb_set_tstamp(BPF_SKB_TSTAMP_DELIVERY_MONO) needs to clear the
>>> "user_delivery_time" bit.
>>>
>>> I think the "struct inet_frag_queue" also needs a new "user_delivery_time"
>>> field. "mono_delivery_time" is already in there.

[ ... ]

I would think the first step is to revert this patch. I don't think much of the 
current patch can be reused.

> 1. I will raise one patch to introduce rename mono_delivery_time to
> tstamp_type

Right, I expect something like this:

struct sk_buff {
		/* ... */
-	        __u8                    mono_delivery_time:1;
+		__u8			tstamp_type:1;
		/* ... */
};

> 2. I will introduce setting of userspace timestamp type as the second bit
> whem transmit_time is set.

I expect the second patch should be introducing the enum first

enum skb_tstamp_type {
	SKB_TSTAMP_TYPE_RX_REAL = 0, /* A RX (receive) time in real */
	SKB_TSTAMP_TYPE_TX_MONO = 1, /* A TX (delivery) time in mono */
};

and start doing "skb->tstamp_type = SKB_TSTAMP_TYPE_TX_MONO;" instead of
"skb->tstamp_type = 1;"

and the same for "skb->tstamp_type = SKB_TSTAMP_TYPE_RX_REAL;" instead of
"skb->tstamp_type = 0;"


This one I am not sure but probably need to change the skb_set_delivery_time() 
function signature also:

static inline void skb_set_delivery_time(struct sk_buff *skb, ktime_t kt,
-                                        bool mono)
+					 enum skb_tstamp_type tstamp_type)

The third patch is to change tstamp_type from 1 bit to 2 bits and add 
SKB_TSTAMP_TYPE_TX_USER.

struct sk_buff {
		/* ... */
-		__u8			tstamp_type:1;
+		__u8			tstamp_type:2;
		/* ... */
};

enum skb_tstamp_type {
	SKB_TSTAMP_TYPE_RX_REAL = 0,	/* A RX (receive) time in real */
	SKB_TSTAMP_TYPE_TX_MONO = 1,	/* A TX (delivery) time in mono */
+	SKB_TSTAMP_TYPE_TX_USER = 2,	/* A TX (delivery) time and its clock
					 * is in skb->sk->sk_clockid.
					 */
				
};

This will shift a bit out of the byte where tstamp_type lives. It should be the 
"inner_protocol_type" bit by my hand count. Please check if it is directly used 
in bpf instruction (filter.c). As far as I look, it is not, so should be fine. 
Some details about bpf instruction accessible skb bit field here: 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230321014115.997841-1-kuba@kernel.org/


> 3. This will be a first step to make the design scalable.
> 4. Tomorrow if we have more timestamp to support, upstream community has to do is
> update the enum and increase the bitfield from 2=>3 and so on.
> 
> I need help from Martin to test the patch which renames the mono_delivery_time
> to tstamp_type (Which i feel should be straight forward as the value of the bit is 1)

The bpf change is not a no-op rename of mono_delivery_time. It needs to take 
care of the new bit added to the tstamp_type. Please see the previous email (and 
I also left it in the beginning of this email).

Thus, you need to compile the selftests/bpf/ and run it to verify the changes 
when handling the new bit. The Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst has the howto 
details. You probably only need the newer llvm (newer gcc should work also as 
bpf CI has been using it) and the newer pahole. I can definitely help if there 
is issue in running the test_progs in selftests/bpf or you have question on 
making the changes in filter.c. To run the test: "./test_progs -t 
tc_redirect/tc_redirect_dtime"


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-14 21:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-01 20:13 [PATCH net-next v4] net: Re-use and set mono_delivery_time bit for userspace tstamp packets Abhishek Chauhan
2024-03-01 22:21 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-03-05 13:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-03-12 23:52 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-13  4:34   ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-03-13  5:32     ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-03-13  8:52   ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-03-13 18:42     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-13 19:36       ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-03-13 20:59         ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-03-13 21:19           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-13 21:41             ` Daniel Borkmann
2024-03-13 21:01         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-13 21:26           ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-03-13 21:40             ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-03-13 22:08               ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-14  9:49                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-03-14 19:21                   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-14 20:28                     ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-03-14 20:53                       ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-03-14 21:48                         ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2024-03-14 21:54                           ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-14 22:29                           ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-03-18 19:02                             ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-03-19 19:46                               ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-03-19 20:12                                 ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-03-20  6:22                               ` Abhishek Chauhan (ABC)
2024-03-20 20:30                                 ` Martin KaFai Lau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8d245f5a-0c75-4634-9513-3d420eb2c88f@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=ahalaney@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kernel@quicinc.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=quic_abchauha@quicinc.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).