From: Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>
To: Xie He <xie.he.0141@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Linux X25 <linux-x25@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: x25: Fix handling of Restart Request and Restart Confirmation
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 07:35:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e15d185cabc9294958b13f5cff389aa@dev.tdt.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJht_EPk4uzA+QeL0_nHBhNoaro48ieF1vTwxQihk5_D66GTEA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2020-12-09 21:16, Xie He wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 2:31 AM Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de> wrote:
>>
>> >> 1. When the x25 module gets loaded, layer 2 may already be running and
>> >> connected. In this case, although we are in X25_LINK_STATE_0, we still
>> >> need to handle the Restart Request received, rather than ignore it.
>> >
>> > Hmm... I've never loaded the X.25 module after the interface is UP, but
>> > in this case we really have to fix it.
>> >
>>
>> This seems to be a regression caused by moving the Layer2 link
>> handling
>> into the lapb driver, which wasn't intended in my original patchset.
>>
>> I also have another patch on my todo list which aims orphan packet
>> handling in the x25_receive_data() function. Maybe it is better to
>> catch
>> the whole thing there.
>
> OK..
>
> Currently it's not clear to me what your future patches would be.
> Maybe we can first have this patch applied? Because based on the
> current code I think this patch is necessary. When you are ready to
> submit your patches, you can replace my code and we can discuss
> further.
Yes, that's also the reason why I already acked this patch. We can
solve this later a little bit cleaner if necessary.
My patch that takes care of the orphaned packets in x25_receive_data()
has again a dependency on other patches, especially the patch to
configure the neighbor parameters (DCE/DTE, number of channels etc.),
which I already sent before but still have to revise.
Unfortunately I have only limited time for this topic, so I am not as
fast as some people would wish. Sorry for that.
Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-10 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-09 8:16 [PATCH net-next] net: x25: Fix handling of Restart Request and Restart Confirmation Xie He
2020-12-09 9:52 ` Martin Schiller
2020-12-09 10:31 ` Martin Schiller
2020-12-09 20:16 ` Xie He
2020-12-10 6:35 ` Martin Schiller [this message]
2020-12-10 9:40 ` Xie He
2020-12-10 3:35 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8e15d185cabc9294958b13f5cff389aa@dev.tdt.de \
--to=ms@dev.tdt.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-x25@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xie.he.0141@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).