Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: usama.anjum@collabora.com,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Collabora Kernel ML <kernel@collabora.com>,
	Paul Gofman <pgofman@codeweavers.com>,
	"open list:NETWORKING [TCP]" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sami Farin <hvtaifwkbgefbaei@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] EADDRINUSE from bind() on application restart after killing
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 18:15:03 +0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8eb9b438-7018-4fe3-8be6-bb023df99594@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89i+R9RgmD=AQ4vX1Vb_SQAj4c3fi7-ZtQz-inYY4Sq4CMQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Thank you for your reply.

On 5/25/22 3:13 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 1:19 AM Muhammad Usama Anjum
> <usama.anjum@collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We have a set of processes which talk with each other through a local
>> TCP socket. If the process(es) are killed (through SIGKILL) and
>> restarted at once, the bind() fails with EADDRINUSE error. This error
>> only appears if application is restarted at once without waiting for 60
>> seconds or more. It seems that there is some timeout of 60 seconds for
>> which the previous TCP connection remains alive waiting to get closed
>> completely. In that duration if we try to connect again, we get the error.
>>
>> We are able to avoid this error by adding SO_REUSEADDR attribute to the
>> socket in a hack. But this hack cannot be added to the application
>> process as we don't own it.
>>
>> I've looked at the TCP connection states after killing processes in
>> different ways. The TCP connection ends up in 2 different states with
>> timeouts:
>>
>> (1) Timeout associated with FIN_WAIT_1 state which is set through
>> `tcp_fin_timeout` in procfs (60 seconds by default)
>>
>> (2) Timeout associated with TIME_WAIT state which cannot be changed. It
>> seems like this timeout has come from RFC 1337.
>>
>> The timeout in (1) can be changed. Timeout in (2) cannot be changed. It
>> also doesn't seem feasible to change the timeout of TIME_WAIT state as
>> the RFC mentions several hazards. But we are talking about a local TCP
>> connection where maybe those hazards aren't applicable directly? Is it
>> possible to change timeout for TIME_WAIT state for only local
>> connections without any hazards?
>>
>> We have tested a hack where we replace timeout of TIME_WAIT state from a
>> value in procfs for local connections. This solves our problem and
>> application starts to work without any modifications to it.
>>
>> The question is that what can be the best possible solution here? Any
>> thoughts will be very helpful.
>>
> 
> One solution would be to extend TCP diag to support killing TIME_WAIT sockets.
> (This has been raised recently anyway)
I think this has been raised here:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ba65f579-4e69-ae0d-4770-bc6234beb428@gmail.com/

> 
> Then you could zap all sockets, before re-starting your program.
> 
> ss -K -ta src :listen_port
> 
> Untested patch:
The following command and patch work for my use case. The socket in
TIME_WAIT_2 or TIME_WAIT state are closed when zapped.

Can you please upstream this patch?

> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> index 9984d23a7f3e1353d2e1fc9053d98c77268c577e..1b7bde889096aa800b2994c64a3a68edf3b62434
> 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> @@ -4519,6 +4519,15 @@ int tcp_abort(struct sock *sk, int err)
>                         local_bh_enable();
>                         return 0;
>                 }
> +               if (sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT) {
> +                       struct inet_timewait_sock *tw = inet_twsk(sk);
> +
> +                       refcount_inc(&tw->tw_refcnt);
> +                       local_bh_disable();
> +                       inet_twsk_deschedule_put(tw);
> +                       local_bh_enable();
> +                       return 0;
> +               }
>                 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>         }

-- 
Muhammad Usama Anjum

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-30 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-24  8:18 [RFC] EADDRINUSE from bind() on application restart after killing Muhammad Usama Anjum
2022-05-24 22:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-05-30 13:15   ` Muhammad Usama Anjum [this message]
2022-05-30 15:28     ` Eric Dumazet
2022-06-27 10:20       ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2022-06-27 11:47         ` Eric Dumazet
2022-09-30 13:24 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2022-09-30 15:16   ` Eric Dumazet
2022-10-14 15:52     ` Paul Gofman
2022-10-14 16:20       ` Eric Dumazet
2022-10-14 16:31         ` Paul Gofman
2022-10-14 16:34           ` Eric Dumazet
2022-10-14 16:39             ` Paul Gofman
2022-10-14 16:45               ` Eric Dumazet
2022-10-14 17:20                 ` Paul Gofman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8eb9b438-7018-4fe3-8be6-bb023df99594@collabora.com \
    --to=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hvtaifwkbgefbaei@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=krisman@collabora.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pgofman@codeweavers.com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox