Re: [PATCH 1/3] mwifiex: disable ps_mode explicitly by default instead

[Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@gmail.com>]

On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 11:25 -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 7:04 PM Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Microsoft Surface devices (PCIe-88W8897), the ps_mode causes
> > connection unstable, especially with 5GHz APs. Then, it eventually causes
> > fw crash.
> > 
> > This commit disables ps_mode by default instead of enabling it.
> > 
> > Required code is extracted from mwifiex_drv_set_power().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@gmail.com>
> 
> You should read up on WIPHY_FLAG_PS_ON_BY_DEFAULT and
> CONFIG_CFG80211_DEFAULT_PS, and set/respect those appropriately (hint:
> mwifiex sets WIPHY_FLAG_PS_ON_BY_DEFAULT, and your patch makes this a
> lie). Also, this seems like a quirk that you haven't properly worked
> out -- if you're working on a quirk framework in your other series,
> you should just key into that.

Thanks for the review! I didn't know about the flag, much appreciated.
By setting the flag to false explicitly, indeed userspace doesn't try
to enable power_save now at least for this short amount of time. I wonder
if I can drop the second patch (adding module parameter) now. But I still
want to make sure that power_save won't be enabled by userspace tools by
default.

Regarding quirks, I also don't want to break existing users. So, of course
I can try to use the quirk framework if we really can't fix the firmware.

> For the record, Chrome OS supports plenty of mwifiex systems with 8897
> (SDIO only) and 8997 (PCIe), with PS enabled, and you're hurting
> those. Your problem sounds to be exclusively a problem with the PCIe
> 8897 firmware.

Actually, I already know that some Chromebooks use these mwifiex cards
(but not out PCIe-88W8897) because I personally like chromiumos. I'm
always wondering what is the difference. If the difference is firmware,
our PCIe-88W8897 firmware should really be fixed instead of this stupid
series.

Yes, I'm sorry that I know this series is just a stupid one but I have to
send this anyway because this stability issue has not been fixed for a
long time. I should have added this buglink to every commit as well:

BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109681

If the firmware can't be fixed, I'm afraid I have to go this way. It makes
no sense to keep enabling power_save for the affected devices if we know
it's broken.

> As-is, NAK.
> 
> Brian