From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Wang Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] ptr_ring: linked list fallback Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:39:15 +0800 Message-ID: <909327f0-52b8-5c3c-47fe-7b1b71dca196@redhat.com> References: <1519607771-20613-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <01aff5eb-a92f-2170-05f7-664220985070@redhat.com> <20180226223252-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <0316016a-717b-9d3f-5aef-dccaf34d0fae@redhat.com> <20180227190703-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Fastabend , netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 2018年02月28日 11:28, Jason Wang wrote: >>> Well I believe the main user for this is qdisc, which use skb array. >>> And we >>> can not use what implemented in this patch directly for sk_buff >>> without some >>> changes on the data structure. >> Why not? skb has next and prev pointers at 1st two fields: >> >> struct sk_buff { >>          union { >>                  struct { >>                          /* These two members must be first. */ >>                          struct sk_buff          *next; >>                          struct sk_buff          *prev; >> ... >> } >> >> so it's just a question of casting to struct plist. > > Well, then the casting can only be done in skb_array implementation? Ok, could be done in ptr ring. But still looks tricky, because of the different meaning of prev and last. Thanks