From: "rae l" <crquan@gmail.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trivial@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] since the definition of dst_discard_in and dst_discard_out are the same,
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 11:11:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <91b13c310706022011tb3fd221x53e47c92fa69fb62@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4660d133.4d65d79b.64d5.72fc@mx.google.com>
On 6/2/07, Denis Cheng <crquan@gmail.com> wrote:
> they should merged into one
this patch I have checked, it's not corrupted, I wonder someone can
give some comment on this?
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <crquan@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/core/dst.c | 17 ++++-------------
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dst.c b/net/core/dst.c
> index 764bccb..c6a0587 100644
> --- a/net/core/dst.c
> +++ b/net/core/dst.c
> @@ -111,13 +111,7 @@ out:
> spin_unlock(&dst_lock);
> }
>
> -static int dst_discard_in(struct sk_buff *skb)
> -{
> - kfree_skb(skb);
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static int dst_discard_out(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +static int dst_discard(struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> kfree_skb(skb);
> return 0;
> @@ -138,8 +132,7 @@ void * dst_alloc(struct dst_ops * ops)
> dst->ops = ops;
> dst->lastuse = jiffies;
> dst->path = dst;
> - dst->input = dst_discard_in;
> - dst->output = dst_discard_out;
> + dst->input = dst->output = dst_discard;
> #if RT_CACHE_DEBUG >= 2
> atomic_inc(&dst_total);
> #endif
> @@ -153,8 +146,7 @@ static void ___dst_free(struct dst_entry * dst)
> protocol module is unloaded.
> */
> if (dst->dev == NULL || !(dst->dev->flags&IFF_UP)) {
> - dst->input = dst_discard_in;
> - dst->output = dst_discard_out;
> + dst->input = dst->output = dst_discard;
> }
> dst->obsolete = 2;
> }
> @@ -242,8 +234,7 @@ static inline void dst_ifdown(struct dst_entry *dst, struct net_device *dev,
> return;
>
> if (!unregister) {
> - dst->input = dst_discard_in;
> - dst->output = dst_discard_out;
> + dst->input = dst->output = dst_discard;
> } else {
> dst->dev = &loopback_dev;
> dev_hold(&loopback_dev);
> --
> 1.4.4.2
>
>
--
Denis Cheng
Linux Application Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-03 3:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-02 2:08 [PATCH] since the definition of dst_discard_in and dst_discard_out are the same, Denis Cheng
2007-06-03 3:11 ` rae l [this message]
2007-06-05 7:07 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=91b13c310706022011tb3fd221x53e47c92fa69fb62@mail.gmail.com \
--to=crquan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trivial@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).