From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Ahern Subject: Re: [patch net-next 3/6] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Provide offload indication using nexthop flags Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 17:20:23 -0600 Message-ID: <92521fd0-c504-7d74-6f30-02870876e344@gmail.com> References: <20170802075606.1090-1-jiri@resnulli.us> <20170802075606.1090-4-jiri@resnulli.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, idosch@mellanox.com, mlxsw@mellanox.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, hannes@stressinduktion.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru To: Jiri Pirko , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f68.google.com ([74.125.83.68]:36457 "EHLO mail-pg0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751704AbdHBXUZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Aug 2017 19:20:25 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f68.google.com with SMTP id y129so7812369pgy.3 for ; Wed, 02 Aug 2017 16:20:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170802075606.1090-4-jiri@resnulli.us> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 8/2/17 1:56 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: > From: Ido Schimmel > > In a similar fashion to previous patch, use the nexthop flags to provide > offload indication instead of the FIB info's flags. > > In case a nexthop in a multipath route can't be offloaded (gateway's MAC > can't be resolved, for example), then its offload flag isn't set. > > Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel > Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko > --- > .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Tested-by: David Ahern